惠民致远实验学校视导检查汇报材料.doc

惠民致远实验学校视导检查汇报材料尊敬的各位领导，首先感谢你们驾临致远实验学校检查指导工作！我校现有在校生1000多人，专任教师75人。其中研究生学历5名，本科45名，专科25名。本学期以来，我们严格遵守国家各项教育教学法规，积极探索教学教学规律，以“每个孩子都很重要”为核心教育理念，充分尊重、信任每一个孩子，拼搏奋进、求真务实，各项工作都取得了一定的成绩，下面向各位领导简要汇报一下，不足之处敬请各位领导批评指正。一、以提高教学质量为中心，加强常规管理。1.严格执行教学六认真要求，强化教学常规的落实。一是加强课堂常规巡查力度，规范课堂教学，杜绝迟到、中途外出、接打手机、无案上课、坐教等等课堂违规行为，确保课堂效果。二是各教研组，教师要严格按课标要求，制定切实可行的教学工作计划，月课程计划及周计划。三是改进备课模式，提高备课效率，减少无效重复劳动。四是规范作业要求。备课组统一作业量、作业薄本、作业格式；精心选择和设计；作业要做到有发必收、有收必批、有批必评、有错必究，批改认真、符号规范。五是各教师要根据本年级的实际情况，继续切实抓好分层辅导与“提优补差”工作，要针对学习基础不同的学生早作安排，实施有计划、有步骤、有目标的课外辅导，辅导要讲质量、重实效。可充分利用学生资源，做好辅导工作。2.修订、完善教学六认真检查制度、教学常规绩效发放办法、教师量化考核方案、教学成绩奖惩方案等等各项管理制度和考核方案，使之更科学、合理、规范，更能充分发挥和调动教师的工作积极主动性。3严格执行教学常规的月查月结制度。本学期，我们对备课、作业批改和布置、质量检测、学生辅导等等做出了明确具体要求，每月组织人员进行集中检查，并把检查结果进行公布，检查情况给予反馈，考核结果计入教师量化考核。教学常规检查本着求真务实的原则，绝不搞形式，只要查就要查出问题、发现亮点，绝不能不疼不痒，敷衍了事。除去每月集中检查外，学校还组织人员对教学常规存在问题的教师进行进行有针对性的随机检查，实行 “问题跟踪”制度，限期整改，回访检查。二、加强校本研修，提高工作效率。1.充分发挥教研组的职能作用。各教研组学期初根据学校工作计划制定了切实可行的教研活动计划，开展系列专题教研活动。教研组每周召开一次主题教研活动，教研组长每次活动都要制定好实实在在的活动计划、安排好活动内容、活动方式（理论学习、观课议课、经验交流）、活动时间、活动地点，并做好活动记录和资料的整理与积累，活动开展比较踏实。2.开展各种形式的课堂教学研讨活动。我们每周一个听评课活动主题，本学期先后开展了优秀课堂观摩研讨、外出教师学习汇报、高效课堂研讨及数学、语文、品德、科学优质课评选等等活动。每次听评课，学校从本学科任课教师、教研组长、主任到校长，高度重视、全部参与。听课后都及时组织评课活动，并且要求教师写出反思和改进措施，活动开展的非常扎实、有效，促进了教师课堂水平的提高，特别是加速了年轻教师的成长步伐。3.积极参加上级教研培训活动。上学期，我们顺利承办区域班主任工作论坛，积极参与区域互查活动。这两项活动安排妥当、准备精心，效果显著，得到教研室领导的充分肯定。本学期，我们精心准备、积极参与了北区域的高效课堂展示。因为我们重视与上级部门的和兄弟单位的交流和联系，我们逐渐融入惠民教育这个团体，并和兄弟单位与上级业务主管部分建立了比较良好的关系,对我们各项工作促进很大。4.积极开展高校课堂的研讨，探索和构建高效课堂教学模式。提高课堂效率、打造高效课堂是学校内涵发展必走之路。我们个别学科之所以教学质量不理想，就是因为课堂效率低、学习效果差，造成学生虽在校时间长，有效学习时间却很短，时间资源被大量浪费。要想使时间长真正成为我们的优势，必须要提高课堂教学质量和效率。本学期，根据我校实际，借鉴其他学校的成功经验，我们制定了数学学科的“自主探究、合作互动”的教学模式，语文学科的“精雕细琢读为本，小组合作堂堂清”教学模式，品德学科的“自主探究、合作整合”，并组织了高效课堂模式学习、高效课堂模式观摩和研讨、高效课堂模式推广等活动，老师在学习、探讨和实践过程中课堂教学水平也得到了提升。5.积极开展多种形式的校本教研活动。上学期我们先后组织了教师备课展评、优秀教学设计评选、一师一优课等校级教研活动，组织老师积极参与骨干教师评选、论文评选等等县级以上教研活动，以教研组为单位的主体教研活动和以备课组为单位的集体备课常抓不懈。本学期，我们新教育实验学校的审批和实验项目的开展为契机，开展了新教育活动的探索和实践，这对我校教研水平的提高，教师专业成长的促进、教师职业幸福指数的提高对起到很大的作用。 三、加大教师培训力度，熔炼教师队伍，提高教师素质，打造一流的教师队伍。本学期我们坚持“骨干带动、同伴互助、自我反思、自主发展”的策略，采取多项措施，促进教师专业化成长。1.请进来、走出去，博采众家之长。为促进教师加快成长，学校本着更加开放的心态，加强了与外界的合作和交流。学校充分利用所依托的教育资源，通过专家讲座、引课入校、外出听课、外出参观等等形式，为教师创造学习、观摩研讨的机会，多渠道提高教师的课堂教学水平和综合业务素质。本学期，我们积极参加上级部门组织的各种培训研讨活动，开学仅2个多月，我们派出外出学习的教师多大30多人次。10月份，学校开展了“名师、名校长送教活动”，邀请高靑双语学校部分名师送教到校，并聆听了包校长做了关于教育教学的个专题讲座，让教师近距离与专家、名师对话交流，享受了先进理念熏陶。11月份，学校组织学校中层和部分骨干教师到德州夏津双语、江苏宿迁双语学校等等名校进行了参观学习。总之，学校在促进教师专业成长上不惜资金、不遗余力，我校青年教师成长非常快，现在，我校已拥有市教学能手1人，县级教学能手10名，县学科带头人5名.2.实施青蓝工程，落实帮扶制度，提高新教师教学水平。本学期继续在教师中开展“传帮带”活动，实现以“老”带“新”，帮助新教师快速掌握新教法，提升业务水平。学校在上学期基础上完善了的活动方案，给新老教师定目标、定任务，签到责任状，并制定了相应的考核措施，促使该项工作能实实在在的抓到实处，使我们的青年教师得到了尽快成长。3.加强岗位练兵。一是继续加强了教师的基本功训练，本学期继续扎实抓好“两笔一话”，争取每位教师都能写一手漂亮的钢笔字、粉笔字，说一口标准的普通话。11月份，为积极倡导全校教师勤练教学基本功，根据学期初工作的安排，本着“全员参与、岗位练兵、提升素养、展示风采”的宗旨，举办了教师毛笔书法比赛，促进了教师专业成长，提高教师综合素养。二是以课堂大比武为平台，深入开展课堂教学评比活动，唤醒教师比、学、赶、帮、超的意识与行动，激发他们的教学热情，切实提高教学技能和技巧，促进了教师专业发展。4加大对骨干教师的培训力度。对工作有热情、发展有潜力的教师，学校尽全力为他们创造和争取进修提高的机会，提供搭建登台亮相、施展才华的舞台，使更多教师脱颖而出，带动教师整体水平的提高。现在我校有1位市骨干教师培养对象，20多人申请加入县骨干教师培养对象范围，骨干教师队伍得到锻炼和系统培训，专业成长成长很快。5制定教师读书计划，鼓励教师多读书，不断丰富自己知识的积累，提高专业和文化素质。每位教师每学期至少要读2本以上教育教学方面的专注，每月至少1000字的读书笔记。学校每学期至少开展一次全校性教师读书沙龙活动，搞一次读书比较展评，并把这项工作纳入教师考核，促进教师多读书、积淀文化、提升内涵，走上教师成长的有效之路，逐步使读书成为教师的自觉行为和习惯。6.加强实践与反思，倡导勤思、多写。教师每周都要对自己的工作进行反思和小结，反思和校级要实实在在，不搞形式，不说套话。学校还鼓励教师积极撰写教育叙事、典型教学案例、论文、教学随笔等等，把撰写文章作为促进自我成长的抓手。7.、通过师德演讲比赛、学生评教等方式，加强教师职业道德建设。 五、构建科学、合理、长效的教学质量保障体系。1.建立完整、周密的教学质量检查体系，确保教学内容的周清月结。及时有效的查缺补漏确实是提高教学质量的非常有效的手段，它可以及时发现教学中存在问题，及时研究和改进教学方法和策略，对学生存在问题进行补救。所以，建校以来，我们始终坚持实行单元过关、周测月考制度，并不断进行探索、改进和完善，趋利避害、扬长避短。逐步形成了具有致远特色的一整套质量检测体系。 2.建立科学、合理、完善的教学质量评价体系，充分调动教师工作的积极主动性。教学质量的提高是一个系统的工程，影响教学质量提高的因素很多，其中教师的工作态度和责任心却是非常重要的因素。而转变教师工作态度除去师德教育外，最有效的手段就是把每个教师的切身利益和教学质量紧紧捆绑在一起，让教师有“要我干”变为“我要干”。为此，我们结合学校实际，充分发挥学校体制灵活的优势，制定了致远实验学校教学成绩奖惩方案，每学期分两次根据教师教学质量进行奖惩。通过奖惩，增强了教师的危机意识、责任感和上进心，调动了他们工作的积极主动性。3.定期进行成绩表彰，营造浓厚学风。每次考试，学校都要对学生进行各种形式的表彰和奖励，以激发学生学习的积极主动性。单元检测和周测，有任课教师根据成绩对学生进行口头表扬。月考和期中考试有学校通过召开成绩表彰会、发放奖状和奖品、张贴喜报等方式对学习成绩优秀的学生予以表彰和奖励。期末考试学校根据奖学金制度，对学生进行现金奖励多。通过各种形式的表彰和奖励，学生学习热情更加高涨，营造了良好的学风。六、充分挖掘校内外资源，抓好学校特色工作，积淀学校内涵。1.抓好写字教学，学生人人都能写一手规范字。本学期，在全校实施“练字工程”，从坐姿、写字、笔画等基础入手，开发写字校本课程，购买练字摹本，印制练字专用纸，通过“日日练”、“周周结”、“月月评”等，增强学生练字的实效性，调动其积极性，大幅度提高学生写字水平，消灭不规范字，使学生书写成为学校鲜明的特色。2.开展经典诵读活动，创建书香校园。学校将秉承“读书修身，厚积成才”的理念，制定专门的活动方案，努力营造书香校园，提升师生的人文素养，成为书香浓郁的校园。3.实施大课间活动方案，积极开展阳光体育活动，调节学生身心，增强学生体质，丰富学生生活。4.完善致远学校课外活动兴趣小组活动方案，制定和完善课外活动兴趣小组的管理、考核和成果鉴定方案，规范管理，使活动开展的有序、有效、有显著的活动成果。我们工作还存在很多的问题和不足，我们要做的事还很多，也希望在座各位领导对我们的工作多关注、多关心、多帮助、多支持。汇报不足之处敬请各位领导批评指正。 惠民致远实验学校 不足：措施： 请删除以下内容，O(_)O谢谢！The origin of taxation in the United States can be traced to the time when the colonists were heavily taxed by Great Britain on everything from tea to legal and business documents that were required by the Stamp Tax. The colonists disdain for this taxation without representation (so-called because the colonies had no voice in the establishment of the taxes) gave rise to revolts such as the Boston Tea Party. However, even after the Revolutionary War and the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, the main source of revenue for the newly created states was money received from customs and excise taxes on items such as carriages, sugar, whiskey, and snuff. Income tax first appeared in the United States in 1862, during the Civil War. At that time only about one percent of the population was required to pay the tax. A flat-rate income tax was imposed in 1867. The income tax was repealed in its entirety in 1872. Income tax was a rallying point for the Populist party in 1892, and had enough support two years later that Congress passed the Income Tax Act of 1894. The tax at that time was two percent on individual incomes in excess of $4,000, which meant that it reached only the wealthiest members of the population. The Supreme Court struck down the tax, holding that it violated the constitutional requirement that direct taxes be apportioned among the states by population (pollock v. farmers loan & trust, 158 U.S. 601, 15 S. Ct. 912, 39 L. Ed. 1108 1895). After many years of debate and compromise, the sixteenth amendment to the Constitution was ratified in 1913, providing Congress with the power to lay and collect taxes on income without apportionment among the states. The objectives of the income tax were the equitable distribution of the tax burden and the raising of revenue. Since 1913 the U.S. income tax system has become very complex. In 1913 the income tax laws were contained in eighteen pages of legislation; the explanation of the tax reform act of 1986 was more than thirteen hundred pages long (Pub. L. 99-514, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2085). Commerce Clearing House, a publisher of tax information, released a version of the Internal Revenue Code in the early 1990s that was four times thicker than its version in 1953. Changes to the tax laws often reflect the times. The flat tax of 1913 was later replaced with a graduated tax. After the United States entered world war i, the War Revenue Act of 1917 imposed a maximum tax rate for individuals of 67 percent, compared with a rate of 13 percent in 1916. In 1924 Secretary of the Treasury Andrew W. Mellon, speaking to Congress about the high level of taxation, stated, The present system is a failure. It was an emergency measure, adopted under the pressure of war necessity and not to be counted upon as a permanent part of our revenue structure. The high rates put pressure on taxpayers to reduce their taxable income, tend to destroy individual initiative and enterprise, and seriously impede the development of productive business. Ways will always be found to avoid taxes so destructive in their nature, and the only way to save the situation is to put the taxes on a reasonable basis that will permit business to go on and industry to develop. Consequently, the Revenue Act of 1924 reduced the maximum individual tax rate to 43 percent (Revenue Acts, June 2, 1924, ch. 234, 43 Stat. 253). In 1926 the rate was further reduced to 25 percent. The Revenue Act of 1932 was the first tax law passed during the Great Depression (Revenue Acts, June 6, 1932, ch. 209, 47 Stat. 169). It increased the individual maximum rate from 25 to 63 percent, and reduced personal exemptions from $1,500 to $1,000 for single persons, and from $3,500 to $2,500 for married couples. The national industrial recovery act of 1933 (NIRA), part of President franklin d. roosevelts new deal, imposed a five percent excise tax on dividend receipts, imposed a capital stock tax and an excess profits tax, and suspended all deductions for losses (June 16, 1933, ch. 90, 48 Stat. 195). The repeal in 1933 of the eighteenth amendment, which had prohibited the manufacture and sale of alcohol, brought in an estimated $90 million in new liquor taxes in 1934. The social security act of 1935 provided for a wage tax, half to be paid by the employee and half by the employer, to establish a federal retirement fund (Old Age Pension Act, Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620). The Wealth Tax Act, also known as the Revenue Act of 1935, increased the maximum tax rate to 79 percent, the Revenue Acts of 1940 and 1941 increased it to 81 percent, the Revenue Act of 1942 raised it to 88 percent, and the Individual Income Tax Act of 1944 raised the individual maximum rate to 94 percent. The post-World War II Revenue Act of 1945 reduced the individual maximum tax from 94 percent to 91 percent. The Revenue Act of 1950, during the korean war, reduced it to 84.4 percent, but it was raised the next year to 92 percent (Revenue Act of 1950, Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 994, Stat. 906). It remained at this level until 1964, when it was reduced to 70 percent. The Revenue Act of 1954 revised the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, making major changes that were beneficial to the taxpayer, including providing for child care deductions (later changed to credits), an increase in the charitable contribution limit, a tax credit against taxable retirement income, employee deductions for business expenses, and liberalized depreciation deductions. From 1954 to 1962, the Internal Revenue Code was amended by 183 separate acts. In 1974 the employee retirement income security act (ERISA) created protections for employees whose employers promised specified pensions or other retirement contributions (Pub. L. No. 93-406, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 829). ERISA required that to be tax deductible, the employers plan contribution must meet certain minimum standards as to employee participation and vesting and employer funding. ERISA also approved the use of individual retirement accounts (IRAs) to encourage tax-deferred retirement savings by individuals. The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA) provided the largest tax cut up to that time, reducing the maximum individual rate from 70 percent to 50 percent (Pub. L. No. 97-34, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 172). The most sweeping tax changes since world war ii were enacted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. This bill was signed into law by President ronald reagan and was designed to equalize the tax treatment of various assets, eliminate tax shelters, and lower marginal rates. Conservatives wanted the act to provide a single, low tax rate that could be applied to everyone. Although this single, flat rate was not included in the final bill, tax rates were reduced to 15 percent on the first $17,850 of income for singles and $29,750 for married couples, and set at 28 to 33 percent on remaining income. Many deductions were repealed, such as a deduction available to two-income married couples that had been used to avoid the marriage penalty (a greater tax liability incurred when two persons filed their income tax return as a married couple rather than as individuals). Although the personal exemption exclusion was increased, an exemption for elderly and blind persons who itemize deductions was repealed. In addition, a special capital gains rate was repealed, as was an investment tax credit that had been introduced in 1962 by President john f. kennedy. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, the first budget and tax act enacted during the Clinton administration, was vigorously debated, and passed with only the minimum number of necessary votes. This law provided for income tax rates of 15, 28, 31, 36, and 39.6 percent on varying levels of income and for the taxation of social security income if the taxpayer receives other income over a certain level. In 2001 Congress enacted a major income tax cut at the urging of President george w. bush. Over the course of 11 years the law reduces marginal income tax rates across all levels of income. The 36 percent rate will be lowered to 33 percent, the 31 percent rate to 28 percent, the 28 percent rate to 25 percent. In addition, a new bottom 10 percent rate was created. Since the early 1980s, a flat-rate tax system rather than the graduated bracketed method has been proposed. (The graduated bracketed method is the one that has been used since graduated taxes were introduced: the percentage of tax differs based on the amount of taxable income.) The flat-rate system would impose one rate, such as 20 percent, on all income and would eliminate special deductions, credits, and exclusions. Despite firm support by some, the flat-rate tax has not been adopted in the United States. Regardless of the changes made by legislators since 1913, the basic formula for computing the amount of tax owed has remained basically the same. To determine the amount of income tax owed, certain deductions are taken from an individuals gross income to arrive at an adjusted gross income, from which additional deductions are taken to arrive at the taxable income. Once the amount of taxable income has been determined, tax rate charts determine the exact amount of tax owed. If the amount of tax owed is less than the amount already paid through tax prepayment or the withholding of taxes from paychecks, the taxpayer is entitled to a refund from the IRS. If the amount of tax owed is more than what has already been paid, the taxpayer must pay the difference to the IRS. Calculating the gross income of restaurant employees whose income is partially derived from gratuities left by customers has led to disputes with the IRS and employers over how much they should contribute in federal insurance contribution act (fica) taxes. Although customers pay these tips directly to employees, federal law deems the tips to have been wages paid by the employer for FICA tax purposes. Employers are imputed to have paid large sums of money they never handled and for which they no way of ascertaining the exact amount. The Supreme Court, inUnited States v. Fior DItalia, 536 U.S. 238, 122 S. Ct. 2117, 153 L. Ed. 2d 280 (2002), upheld the IRS aggregate method of reporting tip income. Instead of requiring the IRS to make individual determinations of unreported tips for each employee when calculating FICA tax, the Court held that the IRS could make employers report their gross sales on a monthly statement to help determine tip income. Employees also must report their tip income monthly on a form. The IRS then uses these two pieces of information to calculate what the employer needs to contribute in FICA tax.