2IntroductiontoDevelopmentEvaluation模块2发

上传人:gb****c 文档编号:243001379 上传时间:2024-09-13 格式:PPT 页数:32 大小:357KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2IntroductiontoDevelopmentEvaluation模块2发_第1页
第1页 / 共32页
2IntroductiontoDevelopmentEvaluation模块2发_第2页
第2页 / 共32页
2IntroductiontoDevelopmentEvaluation模块2发_第3页
第3页 / 共32页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述
单击此处编辑母版标题样式,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,*,*,Chapter 2:,Introduction to Development Evaluation,模块2,:,发展评价导言,What?,概念,OECD DAC Criteria,OECD DAC,准则,Development Evaluation Context,评价的发展背景,Origin & History,起源和历史,Principles and Standards,原则和标准,Professional Associations,专业协会,1,Introduction 导言,Evaluation, What Is It?,什么是评价?,Origin and History of the Evaluation Discipline,评价学科的起源和发展历程,Evaluation Development Context,评价的发展背景,Principles and Standards for Development Evaluation,发展评价的原则和标准,2,OECD Definition,经济合作与发展组织(,OECD),对评价的定义,Evaluation,评价,The process of determining the worth or significance of an activity, policy, or program,确定一项活动、政策或计划的价值或者重要性的过程,an assessment, as systematic and objective as possible, of a planned, on-going, or completed intervention,对一项计划中的、实施中的或者已经完成的干预措施开展的尽可能系统客观的评估,3,Evaluation: What Is It?什么是评价?,4,Kinds of Evaluations,评价的种类,Formative,形成性评价,focus on improved performance,before and during implementation,(project, program or policy),注重(项目、计划或政策),执行前和执行中,绩效的提高,Summative,总结性评价,focus on outcomes (consequences),注重结果(成果),Prospective,前瞻性评价,asses the likely outcomes of proposed interventions,对建议的干预活动后所产生的可能结果进行评估,Is this program/project/policy worth evaluating?,该计划/项目/政策值得进行评价吗?,Will the gains be worth the effort/resources expended?,相对于付出的努力和资源,评价获得的收益值得,吗?,5,Purpose of Evaluation,评价的目的,Ethical,道德,Managerial,管理,Decisional,决策,Educative and Motivational,教育和激励,6,Benefits of Evaluation,评价的益处,Helps answer questions about interventions,有助于回答有关干预的问题,Benefits for people,对人的益处,direct vs. indirect,直接或间接,intended vs. unintended,有意或无意,short-term vs. long-term,短期或长期,7,What to Evaluate?,评价的对象,Projects,项目,Programs,计划,Policies,政策,Organizations,组织,Sectors,部门,Themes,主题,Country assistance,国家援助,8,Uses of Evaluations评价的运用,Give feedback on the performance of policies, programs, and projects,对政策、计划和项目的绩效做出反馈,Make policies, programs, and projects accountable for how they use public funds,使政策、计划和项目能对公共资金的使用做出合理解释,Help stakeholders learn more about policies, programs, and projects,帮助利益相关者了解更多有关政策、计划和项目的信息,Carried out around the needs of the primary intended user,围绕主要预期使用者的需求开展评价,Clarify theory of change for projects, programs, and policy,明确项目、计划和政策的变革理论,9,Evaluation Provides Information on:,评价提供以下几方面的信息,:,Strategy ,策略层面-,Are the right things being done?,是否在做正确的事?,Operations ,操作层面-,Are things being done right?,做事的方式是否正确?,Learning ,学习层面-,Are there better ways?,有无其它更好的方法?,10,Monitoring and Evaluation监测和评价,Monitoring,监测,routine, ongoing, and internal activity,of tracking key indicators,常规性持续性地跟踪关键指标,internal activity,属于内部活动,used to collect information on a programs,activities,outputs and outcomes to measure performance of the program,用于收集某个计划的活动、产出和成果的相关资料以衡量其绩效,Evaluation,评价,period and time bound,具有一定的时限性,can be internal, external,or participatory,可以是内部、外部或者参与式的,periodic feedback,to key stakeholders,定期向关键的利益相关者进行反馈,11,Who Conducts the Evaluation,评价的主体,Internal evaluators:,内部评价人员,usually know more,通常更加了解:,history, organization, culture, problems, successes,被评价对象的历史、组织、文化、存在的问题及取得的成就,may be too close,可能与被评价对象的关系过于密切,External evaluators:,外部评价人员,have more credibility and specialized skills,具有更高的可信度和专业技能,independent from administration and financial decisions,不受管理和财务决策的影响,12,Who Conducts (cont.),评价的主体(续),Participatory Evaluation,参与式评价,representatives of agencies and stakeholders,(including beneficiaries) work together in designing, carrying out and interpreting an evaluation,机构和利益相关者(包括受益人)的代表共同设计、实施和解读一项评价,participatory methods may be used in internal and external evaluations,参与式方法可用于内部和外部评价,13,Participatory Evaluation (vs. Internal or External),参与式评价,(,与内部或外部评价相比,),Distinction between experts and layperson, researcher and researched, is de-emphasized and redefined,专家与外行、研究人员与研究对象之间的区别被淡化处理和重新定义,Evaluators act as facilitators and instructors,评价人员充当推动者和指导者,Others make the assessment,由其他人进行评价,A more radical step away from the model of independent evaluation,与独立评价模式存在根本性不同,14,Evaluator Activities,评价人员的活动,Consult with,main client and,all key stakeholders,与主要客户以及所有的关键利益相关者进行磋商,Reconstruct or construct theory of change,重建或建立变革理论,Design the evaluation,设计评价活动,Manage evaluation budgets,管理评价预算,Perform or conduct the evaluation (or contract staff to perform the evaluation),实施评价(或者雇用人员实施评价),Identify standards for effectiveness,确认评价效果的衡量标准,Collect, analyze, interpret, and report on data and findings,收集、分析、解读和汇报数据和评价结果,15,Profession status,专业地位,Education and Social Programs,教育和社会计划,Egypt and China,埃及和中国,Timeline 时间表,Expansion into global activity,扩张至全球活动,1980s to now,mid 1970-80,More routine (US and Europe),更加常规化(美国和欧洲),1950s-60s,1957,Sputnik (,前苏联)人造地球卫星,1900,Medical Schools(US and Canada),医学院(美国和加拿大),1880,Modern Evaluations,现代评价,1600,2000 BC,公元前2000年,1940,Reconstruction after WW Banks,世界大战后的重建银行,16,Origins of,Development,Evaluation,发展评价的起源,Audit tradition,审计传统,Social science tradition,社会科学传统,17,Changing Development Concepts,“,发展”概念的变化,Reconstruction Technical assistance Engineering,战后重建 技术援助 工程学,Growth,Projects,Finance,经济增长 项目 金融学,Basic needs,Sector investment,Planning,基本需求 部门投资 规划,Adjustment,Adjustment lending Neoclassical economics,调整 调整贷款 新古典主义经济学,Capacity Country assistance Multi-disciplinary,能力 国家援助 多学科,Poverty reduction,Partnerships Results-based management,减贫 伙伴关系 面向结果的管理,18,Significant Changes,重大变化,From partial development to more comprehensive development,从局部发展到综合性发展,Toward global approaches to development,寻求通过全球途径来促进发展,From individual efforts to coordinated, participatory development,从个体努力到协调的参与式发展,Toward using partnerships for large-scale development challenges,寻求利用伙伴关系应对巨大的发展挑战,19,Development Evaluation:,发展评价:,A sub-discipline of classical evaluation,传统评价的一个分支学科,Uses a variety of methodologies and practices,运用各类方法与实践,Mixed methodologies work best,混合使用多种方法能获得最佳效果,20,Growth of Professional Evaluation Associations,专业评价协会的成长,Increasing numbers of associations around the world, especially in the last few years,全世界专业协会的数量不断增加,尤其是过去几年来,Demonstrate more value is being given to development evaluation as a profession,说明发展评价这个行业受到越来越多的重视,Organizations create a support system and allow for professionalism,这些组织成立了一个支持系统,侧重考虑专业性,21,International Organizations,国际组织,International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation (IOCE),国际评价合作组织,International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS),国际发展评价协会,22,DAC Criteria for Evaluating Development Assistance,发展援助委员会发展援助评价准则,Relevance,相关性,The extent to which the objectives of a development intervention are consistent with beneficiaries requirements, country needs,global priorities,and partners and donors policies.,发展干预的目标和受益人的要求、国家需求、全球重点以及合作伙伴和捐助方的政策相吻合的程度,Effectiveness,成效,A measure of the extent to which an aid activity attains its objectives,衡量一项援助活动达成其目标的程度,Efficiency,效率,Measures the outputs qualitative and quantitative in relation to the inputs.,用来测度相对于投入的定性和定量的产出,23,DAC Criteria for Evaluating Development Assistance (cont.),发展援助委员会发展援助评价准则(续),Impact,影响,Positive and negative changes produced by a development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended,发展干预活动直接或间接地,有意或无意地产生的积极和消极变化,Sustainability,可持续性,The degree to which the benefits,of an activity are likely to continue after donor funding has been withdrawn,衡量一项活动在援助者投资收回后,其收益可能继续下去的程度,24,DAC Specific Principles for the Evaluation of Development Assistance,发展援助委员会(,DAC),评价发展援助的具体原则,Purpose,目的,Impartiality and independence,公正性与独立性,Credibility,可信性,Usefulness,实用性,Participation of donors and recipients,援助方和受援方的参与,Donor cooperation,援助方合作,(continued on next slide),(,转下页,),25,DAC Specific Principles for the Evaluation of Development Assistance,(cont.),发展援助委员会(,DAC),评价发展援助的具体原则,(续),Evaluation programming 评价体系,Design and implementation of evaluations,评价的设计和实施,Reporting, dissemination, and feedback,汇报、成果散发和反馈,Application of these principles,这些原则的应用,26,Why Standards?,为什么制定这些标准?,Promote accountability,促进问责制,Facilitate comparability,提高可比性,Enhance reliability and quality of services provided,提高所提供服务的可靠性和质量,27,Evaluation Standards,评价标准,DAC Evaluation Quality Standards (for test phase application),发展援助委员会评价质量标准 (用于测试阶段申请),Program Evaluation Standards,计划评价标准,United Nations Norms for Evaluation in the UN System,联合国系统评价规范,(continued on next slide) (,转下页),28,Evaluation Standards,(cont.),评价标准,(续),Standards for Evaluation in the UN System,联合国系统评价标准,American Evaluation Association (AEA) Guiding Principles,美国评价协会(,AEA,)指导原则,29,Evaluation Standards,(cont.),评价标准,(续),IEG/DAC Sourcebook for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs): Indicative Principles and Standards,独立评价局,/,发展援助委员会(,IEG/DAC,)评价全球和区域合作计划资料读物:指示性原则和标准,Draws from evaluation standards above and applies to GRPPs,将以上评价标准应用于,GRPPs,30,Evaluation and Independence,评价和独立性,Independent evaluation,独立评价,(OECD glossary):,an evaluation carried out by entities and persons free of the control of those responsible for the design and implementation of the evaluation,由不受评价设计和实施人员控制的独立实体和个人开展的评价,the credibility of an evaluation depends in part on how independently it has been carried out,评价的可信度部分取决于评价实施的独立程度,31,Criteria of Evaluation Independence,评价独立的标准,Organizational independence,机构独立,Behavioral independence,行为独立,Avoidance of conflicts of interest,避免利益冲突,Protection from external influence,免受外来影响,32,
展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 图纸专区 > 大学资料


copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!