DiscussionofWhoisinternationallydiversifiedEvidence

上传人:gb****c 文档编号:243016678 上传时间:2024-09-13 格式:PPT 页数:8 大小:48KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
DiscussionofWhoisinternationallydiversifiedEvidence_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
DiscussionofWhoisinternationallydiversifiedEvidence_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
DiscussionofWhoisinternationallydiversifiedEvidence_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述
Click to edit Master title style,Click to edit Master text styles,Second level,Third level,Fourth level,Fifth level,August 7, 2014,*,Discussion of,“,Who is internationally diversified?Evidence from 296 401(k) Plans,”,Geert BekaertKenton HoyemWei-Yin HuEnrichetta Ravina,2014 Retirement Research Consortium MeetingAugust 7, 2014,Jonathan Reuter,Boston College & NBER,1,Broad Policy Question,How is the quality of individual retirement savings and investment decisions impacted by:,Investor characteristics?,Regional characteristics?,Firm characteristics?,Investment menu?,Default investment option?,Availability of financial advice?,Authors focus on an interesting aspect of the portfolio choice and on a subset of these factors.,Home Bias,Portfolio Theory:,Significant (potential) diversification benefits from investing in international equity,Degree of integration has asset pricing implications,Existing Papers:,Document significant variation across countries,Attribute to information barriers & familiarity biases,This Paper:,Documents significant variation in home bias across states and 401(k) plans in the U.S.,Seeks to explain variation in home bias using the characteristics of individuals, regions, and firms,Data & Findings,Data from Financial Engines:,Account-level data on,3.8 million,investors in,296,DC plans,Large plans offered by large firms, covering,2006-2011,Main Findings:,Cross-individual dispersion of home bias in U.S.,cross-country dispersion in home bias,Allocation to international equity,increases over time,“Consistent with ongoing globalization process making people more comfortable with foreign investing”,More educated and literate areas hold more intl equity,Persistent differences across regions and firms,Areas with more foreign-born people hold more intl equity,Affiliates of foreign firms hold more intl equity,1,st,Main Finding is Robust,I calculated holdings of international equity funds as % of all equity MF holdings using,BrightScope,data on,17,913,DC plans,10,th,percentile:,10.2%,25,th,percentile:,15.3%,50,th,percentile:,21.1%,75,th,percentile:,28.4%,90,th,percentile:,37.5%,Notes:,Fraction of assets allocated to intl equity is positively correlated with fraction of menu consisting of intl funds,( = 0.7453),Suggestive evidence that investment,menus matter.,To capture “intentional” allocations, I exclude TDFs.,Only 63.1% of plan-investment pairs are MFs that I can match to an asset class (others are separate accounts, GICs, .),Other Explanations for Trend?,Cost,of international diversification has fallen,Median expense ratios of domestic and intl equity funds have been converging:,U.S. Growth:,1.38%,in 2006,1.25%,in 2013,Intl Equity:,1.65%,in 2006,1.42%,in 2013,Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index charges,0.15%,whereas,Vanguard S&P 500 Index charges,0.05%,On the other hand,Benefits,of international diversification has also fallen for U.S. investors,Correlation in monthly returns of S&P 500 and MSCI World ex-US equity index has sharply increased:,1993-2002:,0.7251,2003-2012:,0.9074,Other Explanations for Trend?,Pension Protection Act of 2006,Default switches from MMF to TDFs,Increased allocation to,international equity,.,. at least for plans with auto enrollment and default,Consider samples of TDFs available in 2003 or 2012 with target retirement dates of 2035 or 2040,Beta on intl factor increases from,0.090,to,0.240,Dispersion in Beta increases from,0.048,to,0.070,Unless the authors measure already accounts for these across-TDF differences, they are underestimating both trends,Conclusion,Paper documents and helps to explain variation across portfolios. but offers limited policy recommendations:,We already know financial literacy improves outcomes,Familiarity with international equity is hard to legislate,Next step is to analyze investment menus:,How much of the variation in home bias is due to variation in investment menu options and costs?,Do different types of firms offer different menus?,Balduzzi & Reuter (2013): Riskier firms choose riskier TDFs!,Potential to improve decisions through education and advice,which is why firms hire Financial Engines!,
展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 图纸专区 > 大学资料


copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!