《宏观经济学(第二版)》课件Ch9 AS-AD模型与经济周期理论

上传人:考试不挂****2941... 文档编号:242880591 上传时间:2024-09-10 格式:PPTX 页数:41 大小:805.35KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
《宏观经济学(第二版)》课件Ch9 AS-AD模型与经济周期理论_第1页
第1页 / 共41页
《宏观经济学(第二版)》课件Ch9 AS-AD模型与经济周期理论_第2页
第2页 / 共41页
《宏观经济学(第二版)》课件Ch9 AS-AD模型与经济周期理论_第3页
第3页 / 共41页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述
,单击此处编辑母版标题样式,#,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,单击此处编辑母版标题样式,编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,#,单击此处编辑母版标题样式,#,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,单击此处编辑母版标题样式,编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,#,第九章,AS,AD,模型与经济周期理论,本章主要内容,AS,AD,模型,总供给曲线(,Aggregate Supply Curve,),总需求曲线(,Aggregate Demand Curve,),凯恩斯,vs.,新古典:两种经济周期理论,智者争锋:,萨缪尔森,vs.,弗里德曼:失而复得的“菲利普斯曲线”,新凯恩斯,vs.,理性预期:卢卡斯批判,“奥肯定律”及其他,9.1,AS,AD,模型,9.1.1,由要素市场均衡推导总需求曲线,工资决定与劳动供给:,工资决定公式表明:工资与价格预期水平正相关,与失业率负相关,并与工会力量和劳动保护等制度因素正相关:,工资决定公式隐含了就业与实际工资之间的正相关系,即“劳动供给曲线”:,9.1,AS,AD,模型,价格决定与劳动需求:,价格决定公式表明:商品价格与劳动力成本(即工资水平)正相关,与企业定价能力(即商品市场垄断力量)正相关:,价格决定公式隐含了企业的“劳动需求曲线”:,9.1,AS,AD,模型,要素(劳动)市场均衡,图,9.1,劳动力市场的均衡,图,9.2 AS,曲线,9.1 AS,AD,模型,图,9.3,短期中总供给曲线的移动, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,9.1,AS,AD,模型,图,9.4,总需求曲线的图形推导,9.1.2,由商品市场和金融市场均衡推导总需求曲线,总需求曲线向,右下方倾斜,:财富效应、利率效应,汇率效应, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,9.1 AS,AD,模型,市场均衡从短期到中长期的动态调整,短期均衡,The equilibrium is given by the intersection,of the aggregate supply curve and the,aggregate demand curve.,At point,A,the labor market, the goods market, and,financial markets are all in equilibrium.,In the short run, output can be,above or,below the natural level of output,., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,图,9.5,市场短期均衡,9.1 AS,AD,模型,At point,A, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,Wage setters will revise upward their,expectations of the future price level.,This will,cause the AS curve to shift,upward.,Expectation of a higher price level also leads to a higher nominal wage, which in turn leads to a higher price level.,图,9.6,总供给曲线的短期动态调整,9.1 AS,AD,模型,The,adjustment ends,once,and,wage setters no longer have a reason to change,their expectations,.,In the medium run, output returns to the natural level of,output, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,图,9.7,总供给曲线的中长期动态调整,9.1 AS,AD,模型,中长期均衡,图,9.7,市场中长期调整过程,9.1 AS,AD,模型,凯恩斯,PK,新古典,经济周期理论,周期源起:需求冲击,vs.,供给冲击?,传导机制:价格能否及时调整?,宏观政策:调控政策是否必要、是否有效?,争论的核心:,AS,曲线在多大程度上向上倾斜,?,价格能否得到及时调整?,市场能否有效运行?,9.2,两种经济周期理论,9.2,两种经济周期理论,图,9.8,需求冲击与供给冲击对,ADAS,曲线的影响,凯恩斯,PK,新古典,9.2,两种经济周期理论,表,9.1,宏观经济学中对周期现象进行解释的两大学派,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,图,9.9,政府宏观政策的动态调整过程,从图()来看,这两种扩张性政策的效果一样:在短期内都导致,AD,曲线向右移动, 均衡点先从,A,变到,B,;随着人们的预期和价格水平得到调整,,AS,曲线慢慢向上移动,最后达到长期均衡点,C,,产出回到自然率水平,Y,图()中央银行实行扩张性货币政策,,LM,曲线向下移动,物价水平上升,短期均衡从,A,点,B,点。在长期物价水平进一步上升, 相当于实际货币供应量下降,,LM,曲线将不断上移, 最后长期均衡回到最初的,A,点:产出和利率水平都不变,图()政府实行扩张性财政政策,,IS,曲线向右移动。短期均衡将由,A,移动到,B,。随着时间的推移,慢慢向长期均衡点,C,移动:产出不变,利率上升,表,9.2,政府政策不同政策工具在短期与长期的影响,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,政策的“时滞”问题,内部时滞:当经济遭受一个外部冲击之后,政府的决策部门要觉察到这一冲击并采取相应措施需要一定的时间,这个时间为内部时滞,外部时滞:政策实施之后经济中的行为人做出反应和调整,使各项宏观经济指标最终达到既定的政策目标又需要一段时间,称为外部时滞,财政政策与货币政策相比,内部时滞要长得多,不同的政策手段外部时滞相差较大,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,图,9.10,美国扩张性货币政策的时滞分析,右图是布兰查德(,2003,) 根据美国,1960-1990,年的数据所做的研究结果,展示了美联储采取紧缩性的货币政策(例如通过公开市场操作减少基础货币供给)将联邦利率提高,对各宏观经济变量的动态影响。,可以看到,对产出、就业和失业率的影响大约在个季度时得到充分显现,但对物价水平的影响要到个季度之后才逐渐显现。根据这一结果,货币政策的外部时滞大约是年半到年。,How Long Lasting Are the Real Effects of Money?,The Effects of an Expansion in Nominal Money in the Taylor Model, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,图,9.11,政府的需求管理政策:效果的时滞,While all 12 models predict that output will increase for some time in response to a monetary expansion, the range of answers regarding the size and the length of the output response is large., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,图,9.12,政府的需求管理政策:效果的不确定性,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,There is substantial uncertainty about,the,effects,of policy,., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,There were two sharp increases in the relative price of oil in the 1970s, followed by a decrease in the 1980s and the 1990s.,图,9.13 1960,年来的石油价格,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,石油危机、供给冲击与经济滞涨,After the increase in the price of oil, the new,AS,curve goes through point,B, where output equals the new lower natural level of output,Y,n, and the price level equals P,e,.,The economy moves along the,AD,curve, from,A,to,A,. Output decreases from,Y,n,to,Y,., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,图,9.14,石油危机的短期,AS-AD,模型分析,Over time, the economy moves along the,AD,curve, from,A,to,A”.,At point,A”,the economy has reached the new lower natural level of output,Y,n, and the price level is higher than before the oil shock.,An increase in the price of oil leads, in the short run, to a decrease in output and an increase in the price level. Over time, output decreases further and the price level increases further., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,图,9.15,石油危机中“滞涨”模型分析,The combination of negative growth and high inflation, or stagnation accompanied by inflation, is called,stagflation,., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,1973,1974,1975,Rate of change of petroleum price (%),10.4,51.8,15.1,Rate of change of GDP deflator (%),5.6,9.0,9.4,Rate of GDP growth (%),5.8,0.6,0.4,Unemployment rate (%),4.9,5.6,8.5,9.3,ASAD,模型中的需求管理政策,表,9.3,1973-1975,年石油价格上升造成的影响,补充内容:菲利普斯,曲线,菲利普斯曲线(,Phillips Curve,),:,Phillips,(,1958,)和,Samuelson and Solow,(,1960,)研究发现,一国,失业率,与,通货膨胀率,呈反向变动关系,为什么菲利普斯曲线是凯恩斯主义宏观经济学的基石?,实证研究中发现的“菲利普斯曲线”支持“,AS,曲线向上倾斜”的理论假说,在政策操作层面,这意味着一国政府可以选择某一“失业率”和“通货膨胀率”的组合作为政策目标,并通过政策操作达到该目标,由,AS,曲线推导出菲利普斯曲线,资料,来源,:根据布兰查德,(,2002,)图,8,1,、,8,2,绘制,图,9.16,美国,1900,1960,年和,1948,1969,年的通货膨胀率与失业率关系,补充内容:菲利普斯,曲线,图,9.17,失而复得的“附加预期的菲利普斯曲线”,根据布兰查德(,2002,)图,8,3,、,8,5,绘制,分别为美国,1970,1998,年通胀率(左)和通胀率的变化(右)与失业率的关系。,补充内容:菲利普斯曲线,失而复得:附加预期的菲利普斯曲线,短期和长期的,AS,曲线与菲利普斯曲线,图,9.18,短期和长期的曲线,图,9.19,短期和长期的菲利普斯曲线,补充内容:菲利普斯曲线,根据弗里德曼的思想,宏观经济学中也把,通货膨胀预期不变时的失业率,定义为自然失业率,在,摩擦性失业、结构性失业和周期性失业,中,,自然失业率,是指产出达到,自然产出,、不存在周期性失业时的失业率水平,此时的经济已经实现了,“,充分就业,”(注意:,实现充分就业的经济中仍会存在摩擦性失业和结构性失业。),补充内容:自然失业率的再讨论,The average unemployment rate in Japan since 1960 has been 2.1%, compared to 6.1% in the U.S. One of the main reasons for this difference appears to be the widespread reliance on lifetime employment in the Japanese labor market.,Age Group,16-19,20-24,25-29,55-64,Japan,0.72,2.06,2.71,4.91,United States,2.0,4.40,6.15,10.95, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,各国的“自然失业率”:日本,补充内容:自然失业率的再讨论,表,9.4,Cumulative Number of Jobs Held by Males of Different Ages, In Japan and the United States.,Change in Inflation versus Unemployment: Euro Area since 1961 (Squares denote the 1960s, diamonds the 1970s, triangles the dates since 1980), 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,The Phillips curve relation between the change in the inflation rate and the unemployment rate has shifted to the right over time, suggesting a steady increase in the natural unemployment rate in Europe since 1960.,图,9.20,欧盟国家的菲利普斯曲线,各国的“自然失业率”:欧盟,补充内容:自然失业率的再讨论,Has the U.S. Natural Rate of Unemployment Fallen Since the Early 1990s and, If so, Why?, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,Since the mid-1990s, the change in inflation has typically been less than would have been predicted by the average relation between inflation and unemployment for the period 1970-2003.,各国的“自然失业率”:美国,补充内容:自然失业率的再讨论,图,9.21,美国,90,年代 的菲利普斯曲线,公众预期与政策可信性,The,Lucas critique,states that it is unrealistic to assume that wage setters would not consider changes in policy when forming their,expectations.,If wage setters could be convinced that inflation was indeed going to be lower than in the past, they would decrease their expectations of inflation, which would in turn reduce actual inflation, without the need for a change in the unemployment rate., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,补充内容:卢卡斯批判,Thomas Sargent, who worked with Robert Lucas, argued that any in order to achieve disinflation, any increase in unemployment would have to be only small.,The essential ingredient of successful disinflation, he argued, was,credibility,of monetary policythe belief by wage setters that the central bank was truly committed to reducing inflation. The central bank should aim for fast disinflation., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,补充内容:卢卡斯批判,The actual relation between,output growth,and the,change in the unemployment rate,is known as,Okuns law.,补充内容:奥肯定律(,Okun,s Law,)及其他,图,9.22,美国,1970,年以来失业率与产出的关系, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,To maintain the unemployment rate constant, output growth must be 3% per year. This growth rate of output is called the normal growth rate,.,According to the equation above, output growth 1% above normal leads only to a 0.4% reduction in unemployment, for two reasons,:,Labor hoarding:,firms prefer to keep workers rather than lay them off when output decreases.,When employment increases, not all new jobs are filled by the unemployed. A 0.6% increase in the employment rate leads to only a 0.4% decrease in the unemployment rate,.,补充内容:奥肯定律(,Okun,s Law,)及其他,Country,1960-1980,1981-2003,United States,0.39,0.39,United Kingdom,0.15,0.54,Germany,0.20,0.32,Japan,0.02,0.12,The coefficient,in Okuns law gives the effect on the unemployment rate of deviations of output growth from normal. A value of,of 0.4 tells us that output growth 1% above the normal growth rate for 1 year decreases the unemployment rate by 0.4%., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,补充内容:奥肯定律(,Okun,s Law,)及其他,各国 奥肯定律,表,9.4,Okuns Law Coefficients Across Countries and Time,Three important relations:,Okuns Law,which relates the change in unemployment to output growth.,The Phillips curve, which relates the changes in inflation to unemployment.,The aggregate demand (AD) relation, which relates output growth to both nominal money growth and inflation., 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,补充内容:总结, 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier Blanchard,补充内容:总结,图,9.23,产出增长、失业、通货膨胀及名义货币增长之间的关系,我们学到什么?,居民、企业等微观主体对政策和市场的“预期”是重要的,政府应减少对市场的价格干预,宏观政策应规则简单、执行稳定,政府的“诚信”很重要,坚实的微观基础对宏观经济理论非常重要,短期凯恩斯主义有效,长期新古典主义正确,
展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 图纸专区 > 课件教案


copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!