傲慢与偏见读后感(英文版)

傲慢与偏见读后感（英文版）导读： 本文 傲慢与偏见读后感(英文版) ，仅供参考，如果能帮助到 您，欢迎点评和分享。读后感是自己阅读书籍之后有感而发的一些见解和感悟。 通常都 是些简短的发表自己的感想， 读后感栏目就为您提供了诸多中外名著 的读后感，相信对于您应该有所帮助 !Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters.The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and issomehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen sfavourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.I couldn t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marryoff her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain atthat time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheritinghis father psossessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.In “ Pride and Prejudice”th,e sister of Mr. Bingleystrongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.In modern society, althoughthe marriages of economicneedshavedecreasedrapidly,the concept of“ moneydetermineseverything”is stillrooted in somepeople smind.A lotof parentstry hardto interfere theirchildren smarriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remainss marriage. Marry forthe main reason that may influence one money is still a big problem in our society. We can t help thinking: can money determine everything?Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “ Pride and Prejudice, her ”sharp observation of social livesmakes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.