齿轮模具重点标准设计专题方案

上传人:枕*** 文档编号:120848487 上传时间:2022-07-18 格式:DOC 页数:69 大小:9.86MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
齿轮模具重点标准设计专题方案_第1页
第1页 / 共69页
齿轮模具重点标准设计专题方案_第2页
第2页 / 共69页
齿轮模具重点标准设计专题方案_第3页
第3页 / 共69页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述
Table of Contents1. Introduction32. Background2.1 Introduction2.2 Attainable tolerances and causes inaccuracies2.3 Influences on precision53. Hewlett-Packard3.1 Way of working3.2 HP process system3.3 Co-operation with Philips94. Rogue4.1 Specifications4.2 Development general4.3 Tolerance analysis4.4 Product Design4.5 Mould Design4.6 Material4.7 Process Design4.8 Design rules Rogue155. Carnegie5.1 Specifications5.2 Development Carnegie general5.3 Tolerance analysis5.4 Product Design5.5 Mould Design5.6 Material5.7 Process Design5.8 Design rules Carnegie276. Design rules6.1 Process396.2 Material6.3 Mould6.4 Product7. Case study7.1 Specifications7.2 Product analysis7.3 Development7.4 Next generation478. Literature61AppendicesAppendix AStatistic Process Control (in Dutch)Appendix BInjection moulding and tolerances (in Dutch)Appendix C1Product documentation RogueAppendix C2Tolerance analysis RogueAppendix DAttainable tolerancesAppendix E1Product documentation Carnegie Appendix E2Tolerance Analysis Carnegie1. IntroductionThis project has been set up to fasten down the knowledge within the CCP about high precision injection moulding in relation to the Hewlett-Packard (HP) carriages. Two carriages for HP are developed for high precision injection moulding in co-operation with Philips Competence Centre Plastics. “Rogue” was a test case to develop a precision technology by injection moulding, fit for high precision in high volumes. In this case tolerances had to be attained, not by adjusting in the assembly line but by injection moulding. The results were the base for the development of the manufacturing process (part design, mould manufacturing, injection moulding process) for the “Carnegie” carriage.With the goal to help HP in the future developing products with similar aspects it is important to fasten down the obtained knowledge about this subject. This study will result in a general description of design rules for high precision injection moulding that can be used in the early stage of development. The earlier the co-operation with the customer can start the more efficient the product can be designed for high precision. Efficient in terms of shorter lead-times and more robust processing.The goal of the design rules is to share the knowledge within the BG-Plastics so people can use the experience in the future designs. This report starts with a general description about high precision injection moulding. Special attention needs to be paid to the process, the mould, the material and the product design.The product design is essential for high precision injection moulding. A poorly designed part, no matter how extraordinary the mould construction or process is, can destroy any chance of achieving the very tight tolerances of the precision part. The carriages of HP are the examples used to finally formulate the design rules for high precision injection moulding. One chapter has been spent on the development of the Rogue and one on the development of the Carnegie. This report ends with a test product to illustrate the design rules.2. Background2.1 IntroductionTalking about precision in plastics, is talking about micrometers and how to control micrometers within specification. It is about precision of plastic parts without any finishing treatment.Precision is influenced by:1. Material2. Process3. Mould4. Product designSo how can these aspects be handled to get the required precision? Before answering this question it is important to know what the inaccuracy sources can be and what the capable precision of plastics is.What are attainable tolerances and what causes inaccuracies in the product?2.2 Attainable tolerances and sources of inaccuraciesFour elements are related to high precision injection moulding. Each element has its own requirements in respect to material, process, mould and product design.1. Dimensional accuracyThe nominal values and their tolerances required for the product.2. Shape accuracyInaccuracy in the shape like warpage and sink marks.3. ReproducibilityStability of dimensions and shape in mass manufacturing, Cp- and Cpk-values (appendix A).4. Long term stability Long term stability of dimension and shape as function of time, inaccuracy caused by moisture absorption, ageing, creep etc.To deal accuracy of plastics in a good way, sources that can lead to inaccurate products have to be distinguished. Two types of variations influence the accuracy. The irreversible variations, like shrinkage, volume relaxation, “moulded in stress” relaxation and after shrinkage. The reversible variations like expansion through variations in temperature and humidity.Separately from these sources related to the process and material there is a source of inaccuracy directly related to the mould.During the process the plastic melt will become solid, which means a reduction of the specific volume. The material shrinks and the final product dimensions are smaller than the mould dimensions. The mould has to be compensated for this effect. Plastics have the property that the shrinkage can not fully be influenced during the process and this causes a variation on the dimensions. If the variation is not time-dependent the process can be called stable. The process is reproducible and the products are within an acceptable process window. The shrinkage can partly be compensated with applying a holding pressure, extra material is post-filled into the cavity.Because of the cooling of plastic during the injection moulding process, thermal stresses will be induced in the material. The volume will change, because the entropy of the material is not maximal and causes a time-dependent change of free volume. The plastic strives to equilibrium of the package of its molecules, this is equal to an increase of density.With injection moulding the cooling time is much shorter than needed. The result is that the specific volume is not in equilibrium. For glassy polymers the free volume is too large. For semi-crystalline polymers the crystallisation is not fully developed. Every thermo-dynamic system strives to maximum entropy (equilibrium state) that means that in time there is a relaxation of volume (post-shrinkage or post-crystallisation) resulting in a change of shape or dimensions. Although this aspect cannot be eliminated, it can be minimised by slower cooling (higher mould temperature). See appendix B.Applying plastics means apply them in conditions that can change. All plastics will show dimensional variations under changing conditions. Variation in temperature causes dimensional variations, the same for variations in humidity. Some plastics absorb water and swell. Because the thermal expansion of plastics is mostly larger than metal, this is a point of attention when applying plastics in combination with metals.To design a product that can be produced with high precision you have to take in account the way tolerances are built up. The four aspects that influence the attainable precision have their own contribution in the tolerance structure.The attainable tolerances can be divided in:1. Mould tolerances (mould)The total concept and the machining method that is applied determine the accuracy of the mould.2. Process tolerances (process, material)The plastic that is used determines the attainable tolerances. The properties that influence the accuracy of the product differ per plastic material type.3. Product tolerances (product design)The sum of the mould and the process tolerances is the minimal attainable tolerance (=Cp, capability of the process). The product needs to be designed with a very close relation to the process and the mould (=Cpk, capability of the process related to the product specifications).Within the PMF a tool has been designed to give the product designer more insight in attainable tolerances for plastic products and the attached price consequences. It is called “Attainable Tolerances in Plastics” and has also been used for the HP carriages projects. Five groups of materials (A, B, C, D, E) and three classes of accuracy (I, II, III) are distinguished. The combination of material A (most predictable accuracy) and class I for the mould/process has the best opportunities for an accurate product. It is also the most expensive one with the most difficult process.2.3 Influences on precisionFor the definition of precision the classes of accuracy from called “Attainable Tolerances in Plastics” are used.IPrecise: adapted precision moulds, technically optimal processing conditions, intensive final inspection and high additional costs.IIAccurate: accurately dimensioned moulds, processing controls less critical and moderate additional costs.IIINormal: mould tolerances can be obtained in normal procedures, the processing conditions are balanced to an as cheap as possible manufacturing process and normal additional costs.The feasible precision is influenced by:MaterialTaking the accuracy into account the choice of material is determined by the shrinkage and after shrinkage, the structure of the polymer amorphous or semi-crystalline, the anisotropy of the shrinkage and expansion.Semi-crystalline thermoplastics shrink more during the cooling in the mould. Because of the control of shrinkage is proportional to the rate of shrinkage these materials have less potential for high accuracy. Amorphous plastics are better suitable for high precision. In general: products can better be designed for high precision when using material with a low shrinkage. Shape accuracy is strongly related to the same aspect. Differences in shrinkage within a part cause warpage. The larger the shrinkage is, the greater the rate of unacceptable deformations of the part.Filling the plastic with glass or carbon reduces the shrinkage and guarantees products with better precision. The material is stiffer and can reduce warpage. Because of the filling the material has a larger anisotropy caused by the orientation of the fibres, which stimulates warpage. It seems better to use spheres instead of fibres for the orientation effect, but in practice the difference has never been demonstrated.The choice of material is not only based on high precision, other aspects like chemical resistance, elasticity, temperature range etc. play an important role.Process The plastic used determines which processing tolerances can be adhered in the classes of accuracy. When the material choice has made the process has to be optimised for the plastic. Operating an injection moulding process means controlling several important parameters. Realising a product according to tight specifications means an extensive investigation into the influences of each process parameter. Main parameters are: Filling stage (injection time, injection speed, injection pressure) Cavity pressure (holding pressure, holding pressure time) Cavity temperature (mould temperature, cooling time) Melt temperature (cylinder zone temperature)These parameters are used for better controlling the shrinkage. The effect of the holding pressure is that the thermal volume shrinkage is partly compensated, so that the shrinkage is better controlled. This means more predictable dimensions and shape and less thermal stresses.HP executes an injection moulding optimisation to determine the process window according to a prescribed procedure. The process has to be robust. A robust process has a process window that includes all not controlled variations of the process. A process variation within the process window will not cause “out of spec” parts (See chapter 3- HP Process System).MouldPrecision in respect to the mould exists of two aspects, the tolerance of the assembled inserts to each other and the tolerance on the manufactured inserts itself. The dimension of the tolerance of the assembled inserts to each other is determined by the centring of both mould halves, the amount of slides and the inaccuracy of inserts. The attainable class of accuracy is thus limited by the machining method. Grinding is more accurate than milling for example. Table 2.1 shows the capabilities for several machining methods. dimensionmethod ( most accurate)jig-grinding (II)profile grinding (I)spark erosion (II)copy milling (III)10 mm0.0050.0040.0030.016100 mm0.010.0060.0050.022Tolerance ( mm) With special precautions and extra cost tighter tolerances are achievable. Max.= 1 mmTable 2.1 Attainable tolerances manufacturing (Source: “Attainable Tolerances”, Anemaat)Tool bounded dimensions are realised in one half of the mould, not tool bounded dimensions are dimensions that are not realised in one of the halves of the mould, but are realised through various moving parts of the mould. For not tool-bounded dimensions the attainable tolerance has to be increased with 25 mm.The class of accuracy of the mould is determined by the most accurate dimension of a product. The largest source of inaccuracy is caused by the margin for shrinkage applied on the mould to compensate the difference between the mould dimensions and the product dimensions. For precision class I the predictability of the shrinkage is not sufficient enough, so the mould has to be corrected on functional dimensions based on the results of the trial runs. For high precision moulds it is important to have the possibility to modify the mould-dimensions steel safe, that means removing steel instead of adding.Product design The product design has to be made in close relation with the material choice, process conditions and the mould design are already made. Design of high precision products is an iterative process with an interactive character. It is not possible to design the product without taking into account the influences of the material, process and the mould on the accuracy of the final product. A large influence on the accuracy of the product and therefor on the product design is the shape of the product. Dimensional accuracy needs to be disconnected from shape deviation, because it is more difficult to control the shape or warpage. The larger the nominal dimension, the more important the right estimation of shrinkage is to minimise the correction of the mould. Precision moulds just have their advantages for small products.In general: if you use the design tools for high precision injection moulding smart, it is not always the more accurate the more expensive. It starts with a smart product design.3. Hewlett-Packard3.1 Way of working Hewlett-Packard is an American company specialised in electronic equipment. They have a strong division for development and innovation spread around the world. The manufacturing of parts is not an activity they do themselves. HP assembles the parts to finished products and put their strong brand name on it. For manufacturing and co-development they have partners to develop in an efficient way (win-win situation) new products. For the carriages of inkjet printers PMF is a partner for co-development and manufacturing. For high precision injection moulded products, HP distinguishes several stages in developing the new process. They start with test tools to prove the technology. Then they manufacture a prototype tool, to test the feasibility of the functional part and to modify the concept for mass-production. This is an investigation of the functionality of the part. In the prototype tool, several optimising steps (development steps) are planned. The lead-time per step is 6 weeks. After releasing the process, production tools are manufactured and released in strict procedure.It is better to invest in tools in the pre-stage of development, because it costs more money and time to modify the final production tool than the prototype tools.3.2 HP Process SystemThe basic idea behind high precision injection moulding is to define the functional dimensions in the product and to make these dimensions adjustable in the mould. An essential and necessary step for adjusting is to achieve a robust and constant injection moulding process. After this the product is measured and the adjustable measures in the mould are trimmed to the correct dimensions (to tweak).Remove steel is easier and cheaper than add steel. HP uses procedures to find out the most robust process. They define the process window for the most important variables and set the process in the centre. Keep the process constant and guarantee good mould quality for high precision products!Procedures:1. Start Objective: Obtain the lowest pressure drop over the flow path and thus the lowest flow-induced shear stress, by changing the velocity.Method: Fill the product with 90% plastic and vary the injection velocity; measure pressure drop in hotrunner. Use datasheet material supplier to determine the average mould temperature and average melt temperature. The injection velocity with the lowest pressure drop is the most interesting.Result: Determination of injection velocity2. Gate freeze curveObjective: Obtain a product surface with acceptable sink marks or stressesMethod: Gate-freeze test Apply the gate freeze test; the holding pressure is already determined and the time of the holding pressure needs to be determined. By varying the holding time the maximum weight of the product can be found. The holding time needs to be as short as possible, for cost efficiency.Result: Determination of the time for the holding pressure3. Multivariable testObjective: Determine robust injection moulding processMethod: Multivariable testVariation of the mould temperature, melt temperature and holding pressure creates a three dimensional diagram representing on the corners the eight possible combinations of the outer and upper values of the three most important process parameters.Determine the minimum and the maximum value of the three variables. The maximum value for the holding pressure is determined by flash or injection problems and the minimum by sink marks or warpage.Choose the average of the parameters by taking the middle of the diagram.Result: Determination of the process parameters; the centre of the operating window.One product of each combination is measured and ten products are kept in stock in case of changing the process parameters. The data are used to select the most critical dimensions. From each important dimension the minimum value is subtracted from the maximum and divided by the tolerance band. The more the value passes over 100%, the more the dimension is sensitive for process variation and the more it is fit for statistical process control in production. Sometimes it is necessary to discuss the tolerance with the “margin design engineer” how functional this precision is.4. Test runs for verifying the robustness of the integral processThe first process test programme has to prove whether determined parameters settings will keep the product dimensions constant. Deviations can be corrected by tweaking in the mould. The mouldmaker can remove or even add metal to correct.Objective: Determine the start criteria for mould tweakingMethod: Running several tests during three days Shot-to-shot Day-to-day Mould-to-mould Batch-to-batch Cavity-to-cavityThe criteria for starting the tweak process is Cp2.0 for all dimensionsResult: Determination of the Cp of all functional dimensions.Cp2 for all functional dimensions or shape requirements 5. Tweaking iterative processObjective: Get all fun
展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 图纸专区 > 考试试卷


copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!