结构件厂钣金焊接和喷涂品质周报

单击此处编辑母版标题样式,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,*,单击此处编辑母版标题样式,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,*,结构件厂（钣金、焊接和喷涂）第,38,周品质周报,结构件厂：崔世新,2014,年,9,月,19,日,1,东莞阳天电子科技有限公司,DongguanYangtianElectronTechnologiesCo.,Ltd.,目 录,2,一、钣金厂各车间质量数据,1.,焊接产品合格率,2.,喷涂产品合格率,二、钣金厂各工序质量数据,1.NC,冲一次合格率及改善措施,2.,折弯一次合格率及改善措施,3.,普冲一次合格率及改善措施,4.,压铆一次合格率及改善措施,三、钣金厂三防稽查,1.,三防稽查数据,2.,三防问题点描述,3.,污水处理状况,4.,电导率数据,四、钣金厂制程异常,1.,制程异常单汇总,2.,制程异常首件汇总,五、下周工作重点,3,一、钣金厂各车间质量数据,一、钣金厂各车间数据,注：达标的数据用黑色字体，未达标的数据用红色字体。,各工序产品一次合格率,质量目标,修改后的目标,第,32,周,第,33,周,第,34,周,第,35,周,第,36,周,第,37,周,第,38,周,第,39,周,平均值,喷涂整体一次合格率（大件）,99.0%,99.0%,89.25%,87.24%,80.65%,82.47%,80.19%,85.22%,93.70%,92.90%,喷涂整体一次合格率（中件）,99.0%,99.0%,85.99%,88.76%,89.05%,84.31%,81.60%,84.66%,94.00%,喷涂整体一次合格率（小件）,99.0%,99.6%,84.56%,88.75%,89.16%,87.68%,82.43%,84.77%,91.00%,打磨一次合格率（白班）,99.0%,99.0%,98.95%,90.14%,97.49%,98.37%,95.48%,97.75%,98.13%,98.10%,打磨一次合格率（夜班）,99.0%,99.0%,87.76%,93.46%,96.80%,96.45%,97.80%,97.22%,98.06%,焊接一次合格率（白班,),99.0%,99.0%,97.53%,94.64%,99.41%,96.63%,95.51%,99.32%,98.18%,98.66%,焊接一次合格率,(,夜班）,99.0%,99.0%,97.53%,94.64%,97.35%,98.16%,96.36%,97.35%,99.13%,普冲一次合格率（白班）,99.0%,99.6%,97.05%,97.31%,98.12%,97.54%,93.99%,97.24%,97.14%,97.14%,普冲一次合格率（夜班,99.0%,99.6%,93.35%,88.61%,97.25%,97.84%,95.31%,96.52%,-,压铆一次合格率（白班）,100.00%,100.00%,99.38%,98.89%,97.17%,99.74%,99.27%,97.95%,99.43%,99.63%,压铆一次合格率（夜班）,100.00%,100.00%,99.63%,98.89%,97.73%,99.01%,98.96%,99.39%,99.83%,钳工一次合格率（白班）,99.0%,99.6%,99.09%,95.94%,97.20%,-,-,-,-,-,钳工一次合格率（夜班）,99.0%,99.6%,95.82%,94.71%,95.82%,-,-,-,-,折弯一次合格率（白班）,99.0%,99.6%,98.95%,97.71%,97.63%,99.33%,97.13%,97.33%,98.42%,98.61%,折弯一次合格率（夜班）,99.0%,99.6%,97.24%,99.16%,94.56%,99.07%,95.26%,97.18%,98.80%,NC,冲一次合格率（白班）,99.0%,99.6%,99.64%,98.11%,98.19%,98.42%,95.17%,95.91%,96.45%,95.83%,NC,冲一次合格率（夜班）,99.0%,99.6%,97.83%,95.46%,89.74%,91.03%,94.77%,99.15%,95.21%,导通率,4,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,喷涂一次合格率及异常数据大件（白班）,缺陷类别,露底,颗粒,挂具印,桔皮,积粉,飞粉,漏撕保护,漏保护,划伤,其他,合计,不良数量,71,41,37,12,11,9,8,6,5,3,203,不良比率,35.0%,20.2%,18.2%,5.9%,5.4%,4.4%,3.9%,3.0%,2.5%,1.5%,100%,累计比率,35.0%,55.2%,73.4%,79.3%,84.7%,89.2%,93.1%,96.1%,98.5%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,露底,喷粉工走枪不均匀,对喷粉工加强培训,陈俊,9,月,19,日,5,喷涂一次合格率及异常数据大件（夜班）,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,缺陷类别,露底,挂具印,积粉,飞粉,毛刺,漏撕保护,划伤,颗粒,变形,其他,合计,不良数量,94,24,21,15,13,8,5,4,2,1,187,不良比率,50.3%,12.8%,11.2%,8.0%,7.0%,4.3%,2.7%,2.1%,1.1%,0.5%,100%,累计比率,50.3%,63.1%,74.3%,82.4%,89.3%,93.6%,96.3%,98.4%,99.5%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,露底,喷粉工走枪不均匀,对喷粉工加强培训,陈俊,9,月,19,日,6,喷涂不良分布中件（白班）,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,缺陷类别,露底,颗粒,挂具印,桔皮,划伤,漏撕保护,飞粉,其他,合计,不良数量,53,9,8,6,6,5,3,1,91,不良比率,58.2%,9.9%,8.8%,6.6%,6.6%,5.5%,3.3%,1.1%,100.0%,累计比率,58.2%,68.1%,76.9%,83.5%,90.1%,95.6%,98.9%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,露底,零件结构复杂，构槽死角位不易上粉,下挂前安排专人对不易上粉进行修补。,周海成,9,月,19,日,7,喷涂一次合格率及异常数据中件（夜班）,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,缺陷类别,挂具印,露底,漏撕保护,积粉,飞粉,变形,漏保护,其他,合计,不良数量,19,9,7,6,5,4,3,2,55,不良比率,34.5%,16.4%,12.7%,10.9%,9.1%,7.3%,5.5%,3.6%,累计比率,34.5%,50.9%,63.6%,74.5%,83.6%,90.9%,96.4%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,挂具印,下挂后未安排人员对挂具印进行修补,下挂后安排人员对挂具印用刀片修理后补自干漆再报检转序,周海成,9,月,19,日,8,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,喷涂不良分布小件（白班）,缺陷类别,露底,漏撕保护,飞粉,颗粒,划伤,桔皮,其他,合计,不良数量,42,24,19,13,5,4,0,107,不良比率,39.3%,22.4%,17.8%,12.1%,4.7%,3.7%,0.0%,100.0%,累计比率,39.3%,61.7%,79.4%,91.6%,96.3%,100.0%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,计划完成时间,1,露底,零件结构复杂，构槽死角位不易上粉,下挂前安排专人对不易上粉进行修补。,9,月,19,日,9,喷涂不良分布小件（夜班）,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,缺陷类别,挂具印,露底,毛刺,积粉,颗粒,飞粉,其他,合计,不良数量,51,23,13,11,10,7,5,120,不良比率,42.5%,19.2%,10.8%,9.2%,8.3%,5.8%,4.2%,100.0%,累计比率,42.5%,61.7%,72.5%,81.7%,90.0%,95.8%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,挂具印,下挂后未安排人员对挂具印进行修补,下挂后安排人员对挂具印用刀片修理后补自干漆再报检转序,周海成,9,月,19,日,10,10,10,二、钣金厂各工序质量合格率,前处理不良分布（白班）,缺陷类别,划伤,焊渣,磷化液,脏污,生锈,其他,合计,不良数量,35,16,9,8,7,4,79,不良比率,44.3%,20.3%,11.4%,10.1%,8.9%,5.1%,100.0%,累计比率,44.3%,64.6%,75.9%,86.1%,94.9%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,划伤,来料产品防护没有做好。,对于来料没有做好防护的产品。一概拒收,赵鲜,9,月,19,日,11,前处理不,良,良分布（,夜,夜班）,二、钣金,厂,厂各工序,质,质量合格,率,率,缺陷类别,生锈,焊渣,划伤,脏污,磷化液,发黄,变形,其他,合计,不良数量,74,50,30,26,13,10,8,6,217,不良比率,34.1%,23.0%,13.8%,12.0%,6.0%,4.6%,3.7%,2.8%,100.0%,累计比率,34.1%,57.1%,71.0%,82.9%,88.9%,93.5%,97.2%,100.0%,序号,问题描述,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,计划完成时间,1,生锈,磷化超期,在物料磷化超期内喷涂,赵鲜,9,月,19,日,二、钣金,厂,厂各工序,质,质量合格,率,率,焊接一次,合,合格率及,异,异常数据,（,（白班）,项目,项目,项目,项目,12,周数 月份,第,32,周,第,33,周,第,34,周,第,35,周,第,36,周,第,37,周,第,38,周,第,39,周,第,40,周,第,41,周,抽检数量,1860,686,2032,504,401,440,549,不合格数,30,15,12,17,18,3,10,合格数量,1830,671,2020,487,383,437,539,0,0,0,目标值,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,合格率,98.39%,97.81%,99.41%,96.63%,95.51%,99.32%,98.18%,#DIV/0!,#DIV/0!,#DIV/0!,TOP1,不良项目,焊渣,线桥脱落,焊渣,焊渣,焊渣,漏加焊,焊渣,13,焊接不良,分,分布（白,班,班）,缺陷类别,焊渣,焊反方向,顶柱焊反,合计,不良数量,5,3,2,10,不良比率,50.00%,30.00%,20.00%,100.00%,累计比率,50.00%,80.00%,100.00%,序号,问题点,原因分析,改善措施,责任人,完成日期,1,21011307,后围框（焊渣）,1,、未清理干净产品表面焊渣,2,、清理焊渣时未使用风枪,1,、严格规定用风枪清理焊渣,2,、对焊接表面适当保护，防止焊渣飞溅,草正伟,2014.9.19,二、钣金,厂,厂各工序,质,质量合格,率,率,14,二、钣金,厂,厂各工序,质,质量合格,率,率,焊接一次,合,合格率及,异,异常数据,（,（夜班）,周数 月份,第,32,周,第,33,周,第,34,周,第,35,周,第,36,周,第,37,周,第,38,周,第,39,周,第,40,周,第,41,周,抽检数量,971,895,1586,1196,357,491,1035,不合格数,24,48,42,22,13,13,9,合格数量,947,847,1544,1174,344,478,1026,0,0,0,目标值,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,99%,合格率,97.53