资源描述
Title,line,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,单击此处编辑母版标题样式,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,*,*,按一下以編輯標題樣式,按一下以編輯母片,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,*,Qisda Confidential,2008,Qisda Confidential,2007,按一下以編輯標題樣式,按一下以編輯母片,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,*,Qisda Confidential,2008,按一下以編輯標題樣式,按一下以編輯母片,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,Qisda Confidential,2007,按一下以編輯標題樣式,按一下以編輯母片,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,*,Qisda Confidential,2007,按一下以編輯標題樣式,按一下以編輯母片,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,*,按一下以編輯標題樣式,按一下以編輯母片,第二層,第三層,第四層,*,*,Qisda Confidential,2008,TX series crack improvement,珍珠圈,1,2,Content,Description,Page/Content,Define,Measure,Analyze,Improve,Control,(,目录,),Page 01 Page 22,Page 23 Page,49,Page 50 Page,65,Page 66 Page,80,Page 81 Page 88,3,Define,界定問題,4,目标,主要活动,工具与手法,产出,1.,取消点白胶,2.,改善,TX,撞件不良,(MI:1600Dppm to 200Dppm),(FA:700Dppm to 200Dppm),3.,定义,CTQ,4.,确认撞件的范围,问题陈述,CTQ,流程图,柏拉图,Trend Chart,Baseline & Target,专案选择,鉴别问题,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,Project Selection,Identify Problem,Identify CTQs,Process Mapping,Verify Problem Scope,5W1H,评估矩阵,(Project Evaluate Matrix),甘特图,柏拉图,系统图,鱼骨图,CTQ,Y= f (X),流程图,(,COPIS/Process Mapping),趋势图,5,(,备选专案汇整,-,用,5W1H,描述,),Project,专案名称,Who,顾客是谁,When,什么时候,What,什么问题,Where,什么范围,Why,为何现在解决,How Much,有多严重,TX series crack improvement,(6H.90060.0F1/ 6H.90000.2F1/ 6H.90000.2N1),Dell,BenQ,2008.01.01,Component Crack,SMT,MI,FA,1. The high quality warning.,2. Reduce gluing cost and improve the production FTY.,1. Quality Warning,caused line stop.,2,.,M,anufacture cost increase,d.,Component crack improvement,(7H.27224.2B1),Philips,BenQ,Dell,HP,2008.03.01,Component Crack,SMT,MI,FA,The high defect impact to the Customer FRR/IFR.,1.Philips Highlight,2. High FRR defect,Define,专案选择,鉴别问题,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,6,(,项目评估矩阵,),项目评估,考虑要素,改善需求急迫,提升顾客满意度,财务效益报酬高,结合企业策略目标,长期慢性潜在问题,专案,有延续发展性,项目团队可掌控,4,个月内可完成,数据容易量化,合计,成,为本次主导专案,Champion,/,Leader,权重,10,8,5,4,3,5,10,10,10,650,备选专案,TX series crack improvement,(6H.90060.0F1/ 6H.90000.2F1/ 6H.90000.2N1),9,9,7,7,5,7,7,3,7,445,BK Lee,Ada He,Component crack improvement,(7H.27224.2B1),9,7,5,7,5,3,3,3,5,339,Define,专案选择,鉴别问题,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,TX series crack quality warning and Dell customer has complaint before during YR review meeting.,The TX series component dosage is very large ( 48 locations for 1pcs PCBA),Same PCBA use for SKD. (1908/1708/V2400W/2408/2007W/2407W/2709W),Note:,7,Define,专案选择,鉴别问题,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,(,专案组织架构,/,人员职掌,),Title :,TX series crack improvement,Team Structure:,No,Name,Dep,t.,Title,Projects Roles and Responsibility,1,MSMP,IE,Improve production line layout/operation/method for process.,2,MSMD,PD,Take the responsibility and follow up for process/workmanship issue,.,3,MSM,V,SQE,Take the responsibility and follow up for,component defect and supplier improvement.,4,MSMQ,QA,In charge measurement system analysis,5,MSMP,Layout,PCB Layout review & trail run arrangement.,Analysis and,advise on improvement action plan,if related to layout,Member Roles:,珍珠圈,珍珠易碎，但又珍贵，藏在贝壳里,Member,Project Leader,Project Sponsor,Member,Mentor,Member,Member,Member,8,点胶前,TX,撞件不良的现象,(,专案历史资料,),鉴别问题,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,专案选择,Customer Complaint:,2006-5, Dell customer has complaint the TX component crack during Y/R review meeting.,Factory Quality System Warning:,Define,点胶后,TX,撞件不良的现象,2006.35,2006.13,停线,次数,9,Define,(,专案历史资料,),鉴别问题,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,专案选择,Containment,Action for TX Crack,:,在,SMT,ICT,测试,后,加入点白胶。,(Cut in Date: 2006.05.16),Printing,Placement,Reflow,AOI,检查,ICT,点胶,结论：,点胶可以降低,TX,零件的撞件不良。但导致撞件的根本原因未知，不能彻底解决,。,10,Define,(,Identify CTQ & CTP,),鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,Internal customer: QA,External customer: Dell/BenQ,voc,Customer,Feedback,CTQ,CTP,Why,many,quality warning,(TX component crack),Improve,FPY,(first pass yield),Stable,process,Process,feedback,VOP,Complex,unstable process,High,rework,11,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,Objective (Expected Improvement),Objective:,Cancel TX component white glue operation,Reduce the TX component crack Dppm,(,MI:,1600Dppm-200Dppm; FA: 700Dppm,200Dpmm,),87.5%,71.4%,Define,Share:,YOSHIKI,的语录,只要去做,就没有做不成的事情,.,也没有不去做就成功的事情,.,YOSHIKI,的解释,:,不管怎样,绝不可以首先就想这个我作不到,.,因为不去做而说作不到的这种说法是非常可笑的,.,也许可能,从这个窗口飞出去而不会掉下来,在天空中飞翔,.,不去做的话,就不会知道,.,一开始就抵制它,这种想法是错的,.,这会限制你的思想,. ,不是在拼命的努力么,?,努力的话,就会成功,.,那么,努力去做的话,不是很好么,?,12,(,专案汇整,),Define,专案编号,CIP 0,4,-0,19,日期起迄,2008.07.18,专案名称,TX series crack improvement,部门,MSMQ,选取专案理由,降低工厂点白胶的耗材成本并,Cost Down,人力，并同时保证产品的品质,专案,问题,现况陈述,工厂点白胶的耗材成本并很高且仍有,TX,撞件的不良发生,专案,目标,取消点白胶，并控制,TX,撞件不良在,200Dppm,之内,财务预估,效益分析,投入成本,0,效益,27346.1 RMB*12,个月,总效益成本,328153.2 RMB/,年,举 例 照 片,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,13,Define,Actual,Plan,Actual,Plan,Actual,Plan,Plan,Plan,Actual,Oct-08,Sep-08,Aug-08,Actual,Dec-08,Nov-08,July-08,Plan,Actual,Step,1,8th,18th,19th,26,th,18,th 1,4,th,1,5,th,05,th,27,th,17,th,Plan,Actual,(,专案,时间表,),鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,14,Define,(,绘制宏观流程图,COPIS,),OOB/IPQC,Good Products,SMT process,MI process,Final Assy Process,TX material,SOP,Test Equipment,TX supplier,Technology,Component,Customer,Output,Process,Input,Supplier,SMT Process,MI Process,FA Process,Level I,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,15,(,绘制细部流程图,),Define,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,Printing,Placement,Reflow,AOI,检查,MI,SMT,投板站,插件站,WS,正背检,ICT,F/T,收板站,FA,Panel,Inspection,PCBA,Assembly,Plastic Parts,Assembly,Connect The,Signal Cable,I/P,DDC,Appearance,inspection,Monitor,Fixing,Final 1,Monitor,Fixing,Burn,In,Output,NG,T/S,OK,T/S,点胶,ICT,NG,OK,Level II,16,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,No,Model,5E,P/N,Location,Q,1,1908 IF BD,5E.05401.M01,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,5E.05401.M02,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,5E.05401.M12,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,5E.05401.M21,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,2,1708 IF BD,5E.05501.M01,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,5E.05501.M12,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,5E.05501.M21,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,5E.05501.M31,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T6,、,T7,5,3,V2400W AUDIO,5E.0F905.M01,T1,、,T2,、,T3,、,T4,4,4,2408W USB BD,5E.0CT08.M01,T1,、,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T5,5,5,2007FP USB BD,5E.L2H08.M01,T1,、,T2,、,T5,3,6,2407WFP USB BD,5E.L2K08.M01,T801,、,T802,、,T803,、,T804,、,T805,5,7,2007WFP USB BD,5E.L2J08.M01,T1,、,T2,、,T5,3,8,2709WFP USB BD,5E.0GY08.M01,T1,、,T2,、,T3,、,T4,、,T5,5,实验机种选择,Define,(,试跑实验,-,Trial Run1,),Model,Forecast (July),1908,100202,1708,60180,2408,47204,2007,45708,2709,10608,V2400,5552,结论,:,选择,Forecast,量最大,的机种做实验,实验目的：取消点胶找出,TX,零件是在哪个制成段发生。,实验方法：取消点胶，在每个制成增加人员用放大镜目检。,实验时间：,2008. 07.282008.08.08,17,Define,(,试跑实验,-,Trial Run1,),SMT,MI,FA,Qty,476090,476225,476100,4000,476120,476130,476101,/,476105,4000,476121,476226,476106,/,476013,2200,476292,476448,476102,/476103,/,476655/,476104,5000,Trail Run Process,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,15200pcs,涉及工单,18,根据数据推论,不良主要集中在,SMT,和,MI,区域,零件不良位号较集中于,ICT,测试接触的板边,.(T6/T7),(,试跑实验,-Trial Run1,),实验数据,层别,确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,Define,Station,NG,DPPM,SMT AOI,0,0,SMT ICT,0,0,MI,线前检验,55,3684,MI Function,16,1053,FA,线前检验,0,0,FA,Function,0,0,SMT,MI,连板,单片板,实验结论,2:,根据数据推论,不良集中,产生于,MI,过锡炉后的站别,.,实验结论,3:,实验结论,1:,19,(,试跑实验,-Trial Run1,),确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,Define,实验不良品分析,1.,此颗材料（,6H.90060.0F1,）目前只有一家厂商,.,2.,厂商常规测试只作阻抗、,DCR,，,Qisda,厂内无测试设备无法作这样的测试，属于免检产品,3.,不良品送厂商测试数据,.,T2,T3,T6,T6,T6,T6,20,(,试跑实验,-Trial Run1,),确认,问题范围,专案选择,鉴别问题,绘制,流程图,鉴别顾客,关键特性,Define,实验不良品分析,实验,结论,4,1.,刮伤,实测值均在规格内,。,2,.,外观破损则影响,TX,零件的功能,。,4.,不良品图片,表面刮伤,零件损件,零件损件,表面刮伤,零件损件,零件损件,21,Printing,Placement,Reflow,AOI,检查,MI,SMT,投板站,插件站,WS,正背检,ICT,F/T,收板站,FA,Panel,Inspection,PCBA,Assembly,Plastic Parts,Assembly,Connect The,Signal Cable,I/P,DDC,Appearance,inspection,Monitor,Fixing,Final 1,Monitor,Fixing,Burn,In,Output,NG,T/S,OK,T/S,点胶,ICT,NG,OK,Define,1,2,High Risk Process for crack,(,试跑实验,-Trial Run1,),专案选择,鉴别问题,确认,问题范围,鉴别顾客,关键特性,绘制,流程图,22,Measure,衡量现况,23,目标,主要活动,工具与手法,产出,1.,收集,TX,系列的产线制成绩效数据。,2,. 层别硬体线与人力线各个差异,数据收集,规划表,柏拉图,量测系统分析,制成能力分析,Baseline & Target,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,能力分析,确认数据,类型与,范围,Verify Data Type & Scope,Determine Collect Data Method & Tool,Evaluate Measurement Systems,Collect Data,Capability Analysis,数据收集规划表,检查表,(,Checklist,),MSA,能力分析,假设鉴定,CTC Tree,矩阵图,(,Matrix Chart,),(Capability Analysis),24,(,CTC Tree),Measure,能力分析,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,确认数据,类型与,范围,Dell/BenQ,Factory QA,Improve FPY,(TX Component Crack),Customer,(,External/,Internal),VOC,Key Issues (Y),CTC Items (y),TX Component,Raw Material,Improvement,Factory,Process,Control,SMT AOI Inspector (Kappa),SMT ICT GR&R (%),Component Strength,Component Adhesion,MI ICT/ FCT GR&R (%),SMT/MI FPY (DPPM),MI Inspector for TR (Kappa),PCBA Layout,决定收集,方法与,工具,PCBA TX location,25,(,测量指标计划表,),Measure,测量,數據名稱,抽样,频率,测量,仪器,Data,Type,测量,部门,测量,人员,测量,月份,數據記錄,數據,展现,工具,y1,TX Material Control,x1,Component Strength,1/Quarter,推力计,计量型,MSMV,Sep.,Reliability Test,2 sample T,x2,Component Adhesion,1/Quarter,拉力计,计量型,MSMV,Sep.,Reliability Test,Control Chart,y2,Process Control,x1,SMT AOI Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x,2,MI T/R Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x3,SMT ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计量型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x4,MI ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计量型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x5,MI FT GR&R (%),1/half year,FT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x6,SMT ICT FPY (%),100%,ICT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,x7,MI FCT FPY (%),100%,FCT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,y3,PCBA Layout,x1,PCBA TX Location,N/A,直尺,计数型,MSMP,Sep,Layout review record,Matrix Chart,能力分析,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,26,(,推力测试,),No,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,實測值,1.7,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.5,1.6,1.6,No,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,實測值,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.7,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.5,No,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,實測值,1.5,1.6,1.6,1.7,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.5,No,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,實測值,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.7,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.7,1.5,No,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,實測值,1.7,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.6,1.5,1.7,1.5,1.7,1.5,能力分析,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,测量目的：验证,TX,零件可承受的推力是否满足工程规格,.,实验方法：用推力计从,TX,零件的横向和纵向施力,.,实验数据：推機從橫向和,縱向,將產品推後之據,(SPEC:1.0KG MIN.),No,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,實測值,1.,8,1.,8,1.,8,1.,8,1.,8,1.8,1.,8,1.,8,1.9,1.,8,No,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,實測值,1.9,1.,9,1.,8,1.,8,1.,7,1.,8,1.,9,1.,8,1.,8,1.,8,No,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,實測值,1.,9,1.,9,1.,8,1.,8,1.,7,1.,7,1.,7,1.,8,1.,8,1.,8,No,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,實測值,1.,8,1.,7,1.,8,1.,8,1.,7,1.,8,1.,8,1.,7,1.,8,1.,7,No,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,實測值,1.,8,1.,7,1.,8,1.,8,1.,8,1.,7,1.7,1.,7,1.,8,1.,8,(,橫向,),(,縱,向,),Measure,数据收集,(,橫向,),(,縱,向,),27,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,能力分析,Measure,双样本,T,检验和置信区间,:,横向,纵向,横向 与 纵向 的双样本,T,N,平均值 标准差 平均值标准误,横向,50 1.6000 0.0569 0.0057,纵向,50 1.7880 0.0594 0.0084,差值,= mu (,横向,) - mu (,纵向,),差值估计,: -0.18800,差值的,95%,置信上限,: -0.17146,差值,= 0 (,与,0.05,不拒绝,H0,测量结论,:,1.TX,零件的抗推力符合规格,(1.0KG),2. TX,零件的纵向抗推力要比横向抗推力强,.,(,推力测试,-2 Sample T),28,(,测量指标计划表,),Measure,测量,數據名稱,抽样,频率,测量,仪器,Data,Type,测量,部门,测量,人员,测量,月份,數據記錄,數據,展现,工具,y1,TX Material Control,x1,Component Strength,1/Quarter,推力计,计量型,MSMV,Sep.,Reliability Test,2 sample T,x2,Component Adhesion,1/Quarter,拉力计,计量型,MSMV,Sep.,Reliability Test,Control Chart,y2,Process Control,x1,SMT AOI Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x,2,MI T/R Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x3,SMT ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x4,MI ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x5,MI FT GR&R (%),1/half year,FT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x6,SMT ICT FPY (%),100%,ICT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,x7,MI FCT FPY (%),100%,FCT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,y3,PCBA Layout,x1,PCBA TX Location,N/A,直尺,计数型,MSMP,Sep,Layout review record,Matrix Chart,能力分析,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,29,(,拉力测试,),确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,测量目的：验证,TX,零件可承受的拉力是否和,SA,定义一致,.,实验方法：用拉力计向上对,TX,零件施加拉力,.,实验数据：,機測試之據(SPEC:1.0KG MIN.),数据收集,No,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,實測值,1.9,1.8,1.9,1.9,2.1,1.9,1.9,1.9,1.9,1.9,No,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,實測值,2.1,1.9,1.9,1.8,2.2,1.9,1.8,1.9,1.9,1.8,No,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,實測值,2.2,1.9,1.8,1.8,1.9,1.9,1.8,1.9,2.2,2.2,No,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,實測值,1.9,2.1,1.8,1.9,1.5,1.9,2,1.9,1.9,2,No,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,實測值,1.9,1.8,1.9,1.8,1.8,2,1.9,1.9,1.8,2,Measure,测量结论,:,TX,零件符合抗拉力的规格,. (1KG),能力分析,30,(,测量指标计划表,),Measure,测量,數據名稱,抽样,频率,测量,仪器,Data,Type,测量,部门,测量,人员,测量,月份,數據記錄,數據,展现,工具,y1,TX Material Control,x1,Component Strength,1/Quarter,推力计,计量型,MSMV,Sep.,Reliability Test,2 sample T,x2,Component Adhesion,1/Quarter,拉力计,计量型,MSMV,Sep.,Reliability Test,Control Chart,y2,Process Control,x1,SMT AOI Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x,2,MI T/R Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x3,SMT ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x4,MI ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x5,MI FT GR&R (%),1/half year,FT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x6,SMT ICT FPY (%),100%,ICT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,x7,MI FCT FPY (%),100%,FCT,计数型,MSMT,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,y3,PCBA Layout,x1,PCBA TX Location,N/A,直尺,计数型,MSMP,Sep,Layout review record,Matrix Chart,能力分析,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,31,(MSA-SMT AOI Inspector),能力分析,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,测量目的,:,降低人员判定的变异，力求资料收集的客观与正确。,测试样品,: 26,个,Sample,PCBA (23pcs,良品板为,A,3pcs,不良品板为,R),测试频率,:,间隔,30,分，重复测试,2,次,测验评核,:,未达,90%,须重新训练后再评核,测试数据如下,:,Measure,No,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,STD,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李瑞玲,1,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李瑞玲,2,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李文文,1,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李文文,2,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李玄娇,1,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李玄娇,2,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,T5 NG,T3 NG,T1 NG,32,每个检验员与标,评估一致性,95 %,检验员,#,检验数,#,相符数 百分比 置信区间,李瑞玲,26 25 96.15 (80.36, 99.90),李文文,26 25 96.15 (80.36, 99.90),李玄娇,26 25 96.15 (80.36, 99.90),#,相符数,:,检验员在多个试验之间，他,/,她自身标准一致。,Fleiss Kappa,统计量,检验员 响应,Kappa Kappa,标准误,Z P(,与, 0 ),李瑞玲,A 0.778723 0.196116 3.97073 0.0000,R 0.778723 0.196116 3.97073 0.0000,李文文,A 0.778723 0.196116 3.97073 0.0000,R 0.778723 0.196116 3.97073 0.0000,李玄娇,A 0.778723 0.196116 3.97073 0.0000,R 0.778723 0.196116 3.97073 0.0000,检验员自身,评估一致性,95 %,检验员 # 检验数 # 相符数 百分比 置信区间,李瑞玲 26 25 96.15 (80.36, 99.90),李文文 26 25 96.15 (80.36, 99.90),李玄娇 26 25 96.15 (80.36, 99.90),# 相符数: 检验员在多次试验中的评估与已知标准一致。,Fleiss Kappa 统计量,检验员 响应 Kappa Kappa 标准误 Z P(与 0 ),李瑞玲,A 0.889362 0.138675,6.41328 0.0000,R 0.889362 0.138675,6.41328 0.0000,李文文,A 0.889362,0.138675,6.41328 0.0000,R 0.889362 0.138675,6.41328,0.0000,李玄娇,A 0.889362,0.138675,6.41328 0.0000,R 0.889362 0.138675,6.41328,0.0000,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,能力分析,(MSA-SMT AOI Inspector),Measure,所有检验员与标准,评估一致性,95 %,#,检验数,#,相符数 百分比 置信区间,26 24 92.31 (74.87, 99.05),#,相符数,:,所有检验员的评估与已知的标准一致。,Fleiss Kappa,统计量,响应,Kappa Kappa,标准误,Z P(,与, 0 ),A 0.889362 0.0800641 11.1081 0.0000,R 0.889362 0.0800641 11.1081 0.0000,判定,Kappa,有效性,失误率,可接受,=0.75,=90,=2,可接受，但需改进,=80,=5,不可接受,=0.40,5,结论,:,1.,测试人员的判断能力合格。,2.,按文件持续评定考核，测试记录保存。,33,(,测量指标计划表,),Measure,测量,數據名稱,抽样,频率,测量,仪器,Data,Type,测量,部门,测量,人员,测量,月份,數據記錄,數據,展现,工具,y1,TX Material Control,x1,Component Strength,1/Quarter,推力计,计量型,MSMV,Moly,Sep.,Reliability Test,2 sample T,x2,Component Adhesion,1/Quarter,拉力计,计量型,MSMV,Moly,Sep.,Reliability Test,Control Chart,y2,Process Control,x1,SMT AOI Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Amy,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x,2,MI T/R Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Amy,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x3,SMT ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x4,MI ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x5,MI FT GR&R (%),1/half year,FT,计数型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x6,SMT ICT FPY (%),100%,ICT,计数型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,x7,MI FCT FPY (%),100%,FCT,计数型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,y3,PCBA Layout,x1,PCBA TX Location,N/A,直尺,计数型,MSMP,Candice,Sep,Layout review record,Matrix Chart,能力分析,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,34,(MSA-MI TR Inspector),能力分析,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,测量目的,:,降低人员判定的变异，力求资料收集的客观与正确。,测试样品,: 26,个,Sample,PCBA (23pcs,良品板为,A,3pcs,不良品板为,R),测试频率,:,间隔,30,分，重复测试,2,次,测验评核,:,未达,90%,须重新训练后再评核,测试数据如下,:,Measure,No,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,STD,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李大鹏,1,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李大鹏,2,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李书飞,1,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,李书飞,2,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,R,A,A,A,A,A,A,A,T5 NG,T3 NG,T1 NG,35,确认数据,类型与,范围,决定收集,方法与,工具,评估,衡量系统,数据收集,能力分析,Measure,(MSA-MI TR Inspector),检验员自身,评估一致性,检验员,#,检验数,#,相符数 百分比,95 %,置信区间,李大鹏,26 26 100.00 (89.12, 100.00),李书飞,26 26 100.00 (89.12, 100.00),#,相符数,:,检验员在多个试验之间，他,/,她自身标准一致。,Fleiss Kappa,统计量,检验员 响应,Kappa Kappa,标准误,Z P(,与, 0 ),李大鹏,A 1 0.196116 5.09902 0.0000,R 1 0.196116 5.09902 0.0000,李书飞,A 1 0.196116 5.09902 0.0000,R 1 0.196116 5.09902 0.0000,每个检验员与标准,评估一致性,检验员,#,检验数,#,相符数 百分比,95 %,置信区间,李大鹏,26 26 100.00 (89.12, 100.00),李书飞,26 26 100.00 (89.12, 100.00),#,相符数,:,检验员在多次试验中的评估与已知标准一致。,Fleiss Kappa,统计量,检验员 响应,Kappa Kappa,标准误,Z P(,与, 0 ),李大鹏,A 1 0.138675 7.21110 0.0000,R 1 0.138675 7.21110 0.0000,李书飞,A 1 0.138675 7.21110 0.0000,R 1 0.138675 7.21110 0.0000,所有检验员与标准,评估一致性,#,检验数,#,相符数 百分比,95 %,置信区间,26 26 100.00 (89.12, 100.00),#,相符数,:,所有检验员的评估与已知的标准一致。,Fleiss Kappa,统计量,响应,Kappa Kappa,标准误,Z P(,与, 0 ),A 1 0.0980581 10.1980 0.0000,R 1 0.0980581 10.1980 0.0000,判定,Kappa,有效性,失误率,可接受,=0.75,=90,=2,可接受，但需改进,=80,=5,不可接受,=0.40,5,结论,:,1.,测试人员的判断能力合格。,2.,按文件持续评定考核，测试记录保存。,36,(,测量指标计划表,),Measure,测量,數據名稱,抽样,频率,测量,仪器,Data,Type,测量,部门,测量,人员,测量,月份,數據記錄,數據,展现,工具,y1,TX Material Control,x1,Component Strength,1/Quarter,推力计,计量型,MSMV,Moly,Sep.,Reliability Test,2 sample T,x2,Component Adhesion,1/Quarter,拉力计,计量型,MSMV,Moly,Sep.,Reliability Test,Control Chart,y2,Process Control,x1,SMT AOI Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Amy,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x,2,MI T/R Inspector,100%,目视,计数型,MSMD,Amy,Sep.,PICS,MSA-Kappa,x3,SMT ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x4,MI ICT GR&R (%),1/half year,ICT,计,量,型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x5,MI FT GR&R (%),1/half year,FT,计数型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,GR&R report,MSA-GR&R,x6,SMT ICT FPY (%),100%,ICT,计数型,MSMT,Leon,Sep.,PICS,Control Chart,x7,MI FCT
展开阅读全文