资源描述
,Click to edit Master title style,Click to edit Master text styles,Second level,Third level,Fourth level,Fifth level,*,Baseline Data and Predictors of Adherence in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy in Maun General Hospital MGH, Maun, Botswana,Nwokike J.I.,B.Pharm, MSc. Pharmacology,Maun General HospitalMaun. Rep. Of Botswana.,ABSTRACT,Background:,In Botswana, there is a lack of baseline data to determine the level of adherence to Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs.,Objective:,This study is an institution-based, quantitative and retrospective study designed to determine baseline adherence values and identify predictors of adherence amongst treatment -experienced patients.,Poplation and Setting:,The study involved 176 experienced (three months of treatment) patients on Antiretroviral drugs at MGH, one of the project sites of the Botswana National Antiretroviral Program. Eligible patients were all the 176 ambulatory patients treated for at least 3 months. Their files were analyzed for adherence reports.,Method,: The adherence measurement instruments used were the 7 days recall self completed questionnaire and pill counts. Pills Identification tests, structured interviews and Monthly Pill Calendar counterbalanced the vulnerability of these methods to fabrications. The study had a zero tolerance to nonadherence. In the follow-up study, 182 three- months experienced patients were administered self-complete questionnaires.,Results:,From the 176 patient records reviewed, there was a determined average adherence per month value of 24.948days 83.16%. Most patients 54.39% were on a Combivir/Efavirenz combination. This patient group had 24.99adherent days/month upper 95% confidence interval of 25.72. Adherence to a Combivir/Nevirapine combination was 29.82 adherent days/month 95% confidence interval of 26.37, P value for the two groups =0.10 Adherence promoters were found to be Adherence Partners (51 patients out of 182 28.02%), Pharmacy counseling (48 or 26.37%) and Pill count at 32 17.58%. Nonadherence predictors include Forgot (49 patients 26.92%), Access (37 20.33%) and Lack of Privacy (33 18.13%).,Conclusions:,Adherence to Antiretroviral drugs at the MGH is below the threshold of 95% that guarantees viral suppression. The identified predictors of adherence can be used to develop interventions to improve adherence on these patients.,BACKGROUND AND SETTING 1,Very high levels of adherence to antiretroviral drugs are a prerequisite for a successful and durable virological and immunological response while low adherence increases the risk of treatment failure and disease progression and contributes to the development of resistance.,1,In Botswana, there is a lack of baseline data to determine the level of adherence to Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, particularly after the introduction of a free national access to ARVs. There is yet no study to ascertain level of adherence on patients who received an institution based adherence program which includes formal adherence education sessions and ongoing adherence counseling.,1. Draft British HIV Association (BHIVA) / Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Diseases (MSSVD) guidelines on provision of adherence support to individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy (2002),BACKGROUND AND SETTING 2,In their Botswana Adherence Study, Weiser,et al,2,found factors that promote non-adherence to include; Cost of medication-(48%) Forgetting-(24%), Ran out of medications-(17%), Travel-(13%), Side effects-(12%), Too busy-(12%), Did not understand instructions-(8%), Too many pills-(1%) This study however was done when patients paid for their pills, patients did not have formal adherence education/counseling sessions and only self report and provider assessment adherence measurement methods were used.,Baseline Data and Predictors of Adherence in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy in Maun General Hospital MGH, Maun, Botswana is an institution-based, quantitative and retrospective study designed to determine baseline adherence values and identify predictors of adherence amongst treatment -experienced patients. These patients received formal adherence education/ counseling sessions which includes the Pre-treatment Antiretroviral Drugs Adherence Counseling, PADAC and ongoing per refill visit adherence counseling. The study used 4 adherence measurement methods.,2. Weiser S.,et al,Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (11.1.03) Vol. 34; No. 3: P. 281-288,OBJECTIVES,-To establish adherence monitoring and measurement tools for patients on Antiretroviral therapy,-To obtain baseline data on the level of adherence,-To identify the predictors of adherence,STUDY QUESTION:,-Is the level of adherence optimal for viral suppression?,-What are the factors that predict adherence/non-adherence?,METHODS 1,Studied 176 patients 74 Males and 102 Females on treatment for minimum of 3 months. All pts enrolled in the program between July-November, 2002 and alive were included The records were reviewed in February 2003.,The adherence monitoring and measurement tools included-,1. Pre treatment Antiretroviral Drugs Adherence Counseling, PADAC, Post PADAC questionnaire and Adherence monitoring SOP,2. Self-complete questionnaires to establish predictors of adherence.,3. Measurement tools- Pill count, 7 days recalls questionnaire, Pills Identification tests, structured interviews and Monthly Pill Calendar.,Pre treatment Antiretroviral Drugs Adherence Counseling, PADAC, Post PADAC questionnaire and Adherence monitoring SOP,PADAC,is a 2 hours drug information and adherence counseling session for patients and their adherence partners. PADAC sessions are held within the week patients are to begin antiretroviral therapy. This session is mandatory before commencement of treatment and is held in Setswana.,METHODS 2,PADAC,session include information on the following:,How the Antiretroviral medicines work 2. How resistance occurs,3. Relationship between adherence, resistance and treatment failure,4. How to take the medicines dosing, reminders, use of concurrent orthodox,or traditional medicines and other special restrictions,5. Side effects and 6. What treatment hopes to achieve.,Post PADAC questionnaire,is,made up,of 12 self-complete questions that,aims at assessing the understanding of the contents of the PADAC,session.,Adherence monitoring SOP,is a,manual for healthcare,providers for the provision of adherence support for individuals on,antiretroviral therapy. It details on the need for adherence support that is,repetitive and ongoing. The SOP is presented as a way to expedite,rather than force completion of treatment.,3,Self-complete questionnaires to establish predictors of adherence.,We designed a self-complete questionnaire with 34 questions to,determine the predictors of adherence. The questionnaire was,administered in the respondents 182 Patients preferred language,English or,Setswana,3. Lerner H.B. et al Rethinking,Nonadherence,; Historical perspective on triple-drug therapy for HIV disease. Ann,Int,Med,Vol,129 Issue 7 573-578 Oct 1998.,METHODS 3,Measurement tools- Pill count, 7 days recalls questionnaire, Pills Identification tests and Monthly Pill Calendar,Pill count:,Patients are usually requested to come to their reviews/refills with their pill containers. Pharmacy staff physically counted the pills, and estimated the volume of the liquid preparations brought back. The Pharmacy records are used to calculate adherence after factoring-in returned quantities. Adherence was reported in adherent days/month percent. The Pill count method employed zero tolerance to non-adherence, ex. missing out 1 dose in a 4 dose/day regimen translates to non-adherence for that day.,7 days recalls questionnaire:,This method,may over-estimate adherence.,4,Structured interviews and probes were used to validate the findings of the 7 days recalls.,Pills Identification tests:,This method correlated with validated self-report adherence measure.,5,Pharmacy staff assigned value to indicate adherence based on findings.,Monthly Pill Calendar:,Patients are issued monthly pill calendars which they return on their refill days. It has the advantage of establishing which specific doses are missed a more critical information in calculating adherent days/month,4.,Liu H, Golin CE, Miller LG. A comparison study of multiple measures of adherence to HIV protease inhibitors. Ann Intern Med 2001;134(10):968-77,5.,Parienti JJ, Verdon R, Bazin C. The pills identification test: a tool to assess adherence to antiretroviral therapy. JAMA 2001;285(4):412.,RESULTS 1,Fig. 1,RESULTS 2,Fig. 2,RESULTS 3,Fig. 3,Fig. 4,DISCUSSION,The average adherence of 83.16% obtained is the composite adherence using the adherence measures listed. Relatively high compared to projections?,Weiser,et al,2,predicted 74% if cost were removed as a barrier,. PADAC? Adherence varied with respect to regimen Fig.1 Patients on CBV/NVP achieved highest adherence 99.4%,Majority of the patients 101 or 57.4% achieved 95% and above adherence Fig. 2. Above 95% adherence is required for virological suppression.,Adherence partner is the most critical factor Fig. 3 that promoted adherence.,Most of the patients 26.92% missed their medication because they simply forgot to take them Fig. 4. Access not financial was another non-adherence predictor and relates to when patients found themselves away from their pills.,CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS,Adherence is below optimal, there is a need to develop enablers and incentives to improve adherence,Simple and non-electronic adherence measurement methods should be standardized as they are crucial in developing countries,There is a need to evaluate the efficacy of formal institution-based comprehensive adherence education and counseling programs,Healthcare facilities should develop adherence monitoring plans that is ongoing and multidisciplinary,There is a need for modified DOTS for orphans and other special groups,Access to medicines does not guarantee adherence, national free ARV programs need to develop and build-in adherence measurement and monitoring guidelines into the national treatment protocols.,
展开阅读全文