A Tale of Two Cities.doc

演讲稿范文/英语演讲稿 A Tale of Two Cities mario cuomo: a tale of two cities on behalf of the empire state and the family of new york, i thank you for the great privilege of being able to address this convention. please allow me to skip the stories and the poetry and the temptation to deal in nice but vague rhetoric. let me instead use this valuable opportunity to deal immediately with questions that should determine this election and that we all know are vital to the american people. ten days ago, president reagan admitted that although some people in this country seemed to be doing well nowadays, others were unhappy, even worried, about themselves, their families and their futures. the president said that he didnt understand that fear. he said, why, this country is a shining city on a hill. and the president is right. in many ways we are a shining city on a hill. but the hard truth is that not everyone is sharing in this citys splendor and glory. a shining city is perhaps all the president sees from the portico of the white house and the veranda of his ranch, where everyone seems to be doing well. but theres another city; theres another part to the shining the city; the part where some people cant pay their mortgages, and most young people cant afford one, where students cant afford the education they need, and middle-class parents watch the dreams they hold for their children evaporate. in this part of the city there are more poor than ever, more families in trouble, more and more people who need help but cant find it. even worse: there are elderly people who tremble in the basements of the houses there. and there are people who sleep in the city streets, in the gutter, where the glitter doesnt show. there are ghettos where thousands of young people, without a job or an education, give their lives away to drug dealers every day. there is despair, mr. president, in the faces that you dont see, in the places that you dont visit in your shining city. in fact, mr. president, this is a nation -. mr. president you ought to know that this nation is more a tale of two cities than it is just a shining city on a hill. maybe, maybe, mr. president, if you visited some more places. maybe if you went to appalachia where some people still live in sheds, maybe if you went to lackawanna where thousands of unemployed steel workers wonder why we subsidized foreign steel. maybe, maybe, mr. president, if you stopped in at a shelter in chicago and spoke to the homeless there; maybe, mr. president, if you asked a woman who had been denied the help she needed to feed her children because you said you needed the money for a tax break for a millionaire or for a missile we couldnt afford to use. maybe, maybe, mr. president. but im afraid not. because, the truth is, ladies and gentlemen, that this is how we were warned it would be. president reagan told us from very the beginning that he believed in a kind of social darwinism. survival of the fittest. government cant do everything, we were told. so it should settle for taking care of the strong and hope that economic ambition and charity will do the rest. make the rich richer - and what falls from their table will be enough for the middle class and those who are trying desperately to work their way into the middle class. you know, the republicans called it trickle-down when hoover tried it. now they call it supply side. but its the same shining city for those relative few who are lucky enough to live in its good neighborhoods. but for the people who are excluded - for the people who are locked out - all they can do is to stare from a distance at that citys glimmering towers. its an old story. its as old as our history. the difference between democrats and republicans has always been measured in courage and confidence. the republicans believe that the wagon train will not make it to the frontier unless some of the old, some of the young, some of the weak are left behind by the side of the trail. the strong, the strong they tell us will inherit the land. we democrats believe in something else. we democrats believe that we can make it all the way with the whole family intact. and, we have more than once. ever since franklin roosevelt lifted himself from his wheelchair to lift this nation from its knees - wagon train after wagon train - to new frontiers of education, housing, peace; the whole family aboard, constantly reaching out to extend and enlarge that family; lifting them up into the wagon on the way; blacks and hispanics, and people of every ethnic group, and native americans - all those struggling to build their families and claim some small share of america. for nearly 50 years we carried them all to new levels of comfort, and security, and dignity, even affluence. and remember this, some of us in this room today are here only because this nation had that kind of confidence. and it would be wrong to forget that. so, here we are at this convention to remind ourselves where we come from and to claim the future for ourselves and for our children. today our great democratic party, which has saved this nation from depression, from fascism, from racism, from corruption, is called upon to do it again - this time to save the nation from confusion and division, from the threat of eventual fiscal disaster, and most of all from the fear of a nuclear holocaust. thats not going to be easy. mo udall is exactly right, its not going to be easy. in order to succeed, we must answer our opponents polished and appealing rhetoric with a more telling reasonableness and rationality. we must win this case on the merits. we must get the american public to look past the glitter, beyond the showmanship - to reality, to the hard substance of things. and we will do that not so much with speeches that sound good as with speeches that are good and sound. not so much with speeches that will bring people to their feet as with speeches that bring people to their senses. we must make the american people hear our tale of two cities. we must convince them that we dont have to settle for two cities, that we can have one city, indivisible, shining for all of its people. now we will have no chance to do that if what comes out of this convention is a babel of arguing voices. if thats whats heard throughout the campaign - dissident voices from all sides - we will have no chance to tell our message. to succeed we will have to surrender small parts of our individual interests, to build a platform we can all stand on, at once, comfortably - proudly singing out the truth for the nation to hear, in chorus, its logic so clear and commanding that no slick commercial, no amount of geniality, no martial music will be able to muffle the sound of the truth. we democrats must unite. we democrats must unite so that the entire nation can unite because surely the republicans wont bring this country together. their policies divide the nation - into the lucky and the left-out, into the royalty and the rabble. the republicans are willing to treat that division as victory. they would cut this nation in half, into those temporarily better off and those worse off than before, and they would call that division recovery. we should not, we should not be embarrassed or dismayed or chagrined if the process of unifying is difficult, even wrenching at times. remember that, unlike any other party, we embrace men and women of every color, every creed, every orientation, every economic class. in our family are gathered everyone from the abject poor of essex county in new york, to the enlightened affluent of the gold coasts at both ends of the nation. and in between is the heart of our constituency. the middle class - the people not rich enough to be worry-free, but not poor enough to be on welfare. the middle class, those people who work for a living because they have to, not because some psychiatrist told them it was a convenient way to fill the interval between birth and eternity. white collar and blue collar. young professionals. men and women in small business desperate for the capital and contracts that they need to prove their worth. we speak for the minorities who have not yet entered the mainstream. we speak for ethnics who want to add their culture to the magnificent mosaic that is america. we speak, we speak for women who are indignant that this nation refuses to etch into its governmental commandments the simple rule thou shalt not sin against equality, a rule so simple - i was going to say, and i perhaps dare not but i will, its a commandment so simple it can be spelled in three letters - e.r.a.! we speak for young people demanding an education and a future. we speak for senior citizens who are terrorized by the idea that their only security - their social security - is being threatened. we speak for millions of reasoning people fighting to preserve our environment from greed and from stupidity. and we speak for reasonable people who are fighting to preserve our very existence from a macho intransigence that refuses to make intelligent attempts to discuss the possibility of nuclear holocaust with our enemy. they refuse. they refuse, because they believe we can pile missiles so high that they will pierce the clouds and the sight of them will frighten our enemies into submission. now were proud of this diversity as democrats. were grateful for it. we dont have to manufacture it the way the republicans will next month in dallas, by propping up mannequin delegates on the convention floor. but while were proud of this diversity as democrats, we pay a price for it. the different people that we represent have different points of view. and sometimes they compete and even debate, and even argue. thats what our primaries were all about. but now the primaries are over and it is time when we pick our candidates and our platform here to lock arms and move into this campaign together. if you need any more inspiration to put some small part of your own differences aside to create this consensus, all you need to do is to reflect on what the republican policy of divide and cajole has done to this land since 1980. now we must make the american people understand this deficit because they dont. the presidents deficit is a direct and dramatic repudiation of his promise to balance our budget by 1983. how large is it? the deficit is the largest in the history of this universe; president carters last budget had a deficit of less than one-third of this deficit. it is a deficit that, according to the presidents own fiscal adviser, may grow as high as $300 billion a year for as far as the eye can see. and, ladies and gentlemen, it is a debt so large that as much as one-half of our revenue from the income tax goes just to pay the interest. it is a mortgage on our childrens future that can be paid only in pain and that could bring this nation to its knees. now dont take my word for it - im a democrat. ask the republican investment bankers on wall street what they think the chances of this recovery being permanent are. you see, if theyre not too embarrassed to tell you the truth, theyll say that they are appalled and frightened by the presidents deficit. ask them what they think of our economy, now that it has been driven by the distorted value of the dollar back to its colonial condition - now were exporting agricultural products and importing manufactured ones. ask those republican investment bankers what they expect the rate of interest to be a year from now. and ask them, if they dare tell you the truth you will hear from them, what they predict for the inflation rate a year from now, because of the deficit. now, how important is this question of the deficit. think about it practically: what chance would the republican candidate have had in 1980 if he had told the american people that he intended to pay for his so-called economic recovery with bankruptcies, unemployment, more homeless, more hungry and the largest government debt known to humankind? would american voters have signed the loan certificate for him on election day? of course not! that was an election won under false pretenses. it was won with smoke and mirrors and illusions. and thats the kind of recovery we have now as well. and what about foreign policy? they said that they would make us and the whole world safer. they say they have. by creating the largest defense budget in history, one that even they now admit is excessive. by escalating to a frenzy the nuclear arms race. by incendiary rhetoric. by refusing to discuss peace with our enemies. by the loss of 279 young americans in lebanon in pursuit of a plan and a policy that no one can find or describe. we give money to latin american governments that murder nuns, and then we lie about it. we have been less than zealous in support of our only real friend, it seems to me, we have in the middle east, the one democracy there, our flesh and blood ally, the state of israel. our foreign policy drifts with no real direction, other than an hysterical commitment to an arms race that leads nowhere - if were lucky. and if were not, it could lead us into bankruptcy or war. of course we must have a strong defense! of course democrats are for a strong defense. of course democrats believe that there are times when we must stand and fight. and we have. thousands of us have paid for freedom with our lives. but always - when this country has been at its best - our purposes were clear. now theyre not. now our allies are as confused as our enemies. now we have no real commitment to our friends or to our ideals - not to human rights, not to the refuseniks, not to sakharov, not to bishop tutu and the others struggling for freedom in south africa. we have in the last few years spent more than we can afford. we have pounded our chests and made bold speeches. but we lost 279 young americans in lebanon and we live behind sand bags in washington. how can anyone say that we are stronger, safer, or better? that is the republican record. that its disastrous quality is not more fully understood by the american people i can only attribute to the presidents amiability and the failure by some to separate the salesman from the product. and, now its up to us. now its now up to you and me to make the case to america. and to remind americans that if they are not happy with all the president has done so far, they should consider how much worse it will be if he is left to his radical proclivities for another four years unrestrained. unrestrained. if july brings back ann gorsuch burford - what can we expect of december? where would another four years take us? where would four years more take us? how much larger will the deficit be? how much deeper the cuts in programs for the struggling middle class and the poor to limit that deficit? how high will the interest rates be? how much more acid rain killing our forests and fouling our lakes? and, ladies and gentlemen, the nation must think of this: what kind of supreme court will we have? we must ask ourselves what kind of court and country will be fashioned by the man who believes in having government mandate peoples religion and morality? the man who believes that trees pollute the environment, the man that believes that the laws against discrimination against people go too far. the man who threatens social security and medicaid and help for the disabled. how high will we pile the missiles? how much deeper will the gulf be between us and our enemies? and, ladies and gentlemen, will four years more make meaner the spirit of the american people? this election will measure the record of the past four years. but more than that, it will answer the question of what kind of people we want to be. we democrats still have a dream. we still believe in this nations future. and this is our answer to the question, this is our credo: we believe in only the government we need but we insist on all the government we need. we believe in a government that is characterized by fairness and reasonableness, a reasonableness that goes beyond labels, that doesnt distort or promise things that we know we cant do.we believe in a government strong enough to use the words love and compassion and smart enough to convert our noblest aspirations into practical realities. we believe in encouraging the talented, but we believe that while survival of the fittest may be a good working description of the process of evolution, a government of humans should elevate itself to a higher order. our government should be able to rise to the level to where it can fill the gaps left by chance or a wisdom we dont fully understand. we would rather have laws written by the patron of this great city, the man called the worlds most sincere democrat - st. francis of assisi - than laws written by darwin. we believe, we believe as democrats, that a society as blessed as ours, the most affluent democracy in the worlds history, one that can spend trillions on instruments of destruction, ought to be able to help the middle class in its struggle, ought to be able to find work for all who can do it, room at the table, shelter for the homeless, care for the elderly and infirm, and hope for the destitute. and we proclaim as loudly as we can the utter insanity of nuclear proliferation and the need for a nuclear freeze, if only to affirm the simple truth that peace is better than war because life is better than death. we believe in firm but fair law and order. we believe proudly in the union movement. we believe in privacy for people, openness by government, we believe in civil rights, and we believe in human rights. we believe in a single fundamental idea that describes better than most textbooks and any speech that i could write what a proper government should be. the idea of family. mutuality. the sharing of benefits and burdens for the good of all. feeling one anothers pain. sharing one anothers blessings. reasonably, honestly, fairly - without respect to race, or sex, or geography or political affiliation. we believe we must be the family of america, recognizing that at the heart of the matter we are bound one to another, that the problems of a retired school teacher in duluth are our problems. that the future of the child in buffalo is our future. that the struggle of a disabled man in boston to survive, and live decently, is our struggle. that the hunger of a woman in little rock is our hunger. that the failure anywhere to provide what reasonably we might, to avoid pain, is our failure. now for 50 years, for 50 years we democrats created a better future for our children, using traditional democratic principles as a fixed beacon, giving us direction and purpose, but constantly innovating, adapting to new realities: roosevelts alphabet programs; trumans nato and the gi bill of rights; kennedys intelligent tax incentives and the alliance for progress; johnsons civil rights; carters human rights and the nearly miraculous camp david peace accord. democrats did it, democrats did it - and democrats can do it again. we can build a future that deals with our deficit. remember this, that 50 years of progress under our principles never cost us what the last four years of stagnation have. and, we can deal with the deficit intelligently, by shared sacrifice, with all parts of the nations family contributing, building partnerships with the private sector, providing a sound defense without depriving ourselves of what we need to feed our children and care for our people. we can have a future that provides for all the young of the present, by marrying common sense and compassion. we know we can, because we did it for nearly 50 years before 1980. and we can do it again. if we do not forget.