2016年考研英语一真题及答案(共33页)

上传人:2127513****773577... 文档编号:47237662 上传时间:2021-12-18 格式:DOCX 页数:33 大小:42.55KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2016年考研英语一真题及答案(共33页)_第1页
第1页 / 共33页
2016年考研英语一真题及答案(共33页)_第2页
第2页 / 共33页
2016年考研英语一真题及答案(共33页)_第3页
第3页 / 共33页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述
精选优质文档-倾情为你奉上 SectionIUseofEnglishDirections:Readthefollowingtext.Choosethebestword(s)foreachnumberedblankandmarkA,B,CorDontheANSWERSHEET.(10points)InCambodiathechoiceofaspouseisacomplexonefortheyoungmale.Itmayinvolvenotonlyhisparentsandhisfriends,thoseoftheyoungwomen,butalsoamatchmaker.Ayoungmancan2alikelyspouseonhisownandthemaskhisparentsto3themarriagenegotiations.ortheyoungmansparentsmaymakethechoiceofaspouse,givingthechildlittletosayintheselection.4,agirlmayvetothespouseherparentshavechosen.5aspousehasbeenselected,eachfamilyinvestigatestheothertomakesureitschildismarrying6agoodfamily.Thetraditionalweddingisalongandcolorfulaffair.Formerlyitlastedthreedays7bythe1980sitmorecommonlylastedadayandahalf.Buddhistpriestsofferashortsermonand8prayersofblessing.Partsoftheceremonyinvolveritualhaircutting,9cottonthreadssoakedinholywateraroundthebridesandgroomswrists,and10acandlearoundacircleofhappilymarriedandrespectedcouplestoblessthe11.Newlywedstraditionallymoveinwiththewifesparentsandmay12withthemuptoayear,13theycanbuildaflewhousenearby. Divorceislegalandeasyto14,butnotcommon.Divorcedpersonsare15withsomedisapproval.Eachspouseretains16propertyheorshe17intothemarriage,andjointly-acquiredpropertyis18equally.Divorcedpersonsmayremarry,butagenderprejudice19up.Thedivorcedmaledoesnthaveawaitingperiodbeforehecanremarry20thewomanmustwaitthemonths.1.AbywayofBaswellasConbehalfofDwithregardto2.AadapttoBprovideforCcompetewithDdecideon3.AcloseBrenewCarrangeDpostpone4.AIntheoryBAboveallCIntimeDForexample5.AAlthoughBLestCAfterDUnless6.AintoBwithinCfromDthrough7.AsineBorCbutDso8.AtestBcopyCreciteDcreate9.AfoldingBpilingCwrappingDtying10.AlightingBpassingChidingDserving11.AmeetingBassociationCcollectionDunion12.AgrowBpartCdealDlive13.AwhereasBuntilCforDif14.AobtainBfollowCchallengeDavoid15.AisolatedBpersuadedCviewedDexposed16.AwhereverBhoweverCwheneverDwhatever17.AchangedBbroughtCshapedDpushed18.AdividedBinvestedCdonatedDwithdrawn19.Aclears20.AwhileBwarmsCshowsDbreaksBsowhatConceDinthatSectionIIReadingComprehensionPartADirections:Readthefollowingfourtexts.AnswerthequestionsbeloweachtextbychoosingA,B,CorD.MarkyouranswersontheANSWERSHEET.(40points)Text1France,whichpridesitselfastheglobalinnovatoroffashion,hasdecideditsfashionindustryhaslostanabsoluterighttodefinephysicalbeautyforwoman.Itslawmakersgavepreliminaryapprovallastweektoalawthatwouldmakeitacrimetoemployultra-thinmodelsonrunways.Theparliamentalsoagreedtobanwebsitesthatinciteexcessivethinnessbypromotingextremedieting. Suchmeasureshaveacoupleofupliftingmotives.Theysuggestbeautyshouldnotbedefinedbylooksthatendupwithimpingingonhealth.Thatsastart.Andthebanonultra-thinmodelsseemstogobeyondprotectingmodelsfromstarringthemselvestohealth-assomehavedone.Ittellsthefashionindustrythatitmovetakeresponsibilityforthesignalitsendswomen,especiallyteenagegirls,aboutthesocialtape-measuretheymustusetodeterminetheirindividualworth.Thebans,iffullyenforced,wouldsuggesttowoman(andmanymen)thattheyshouldnotletothersbeorbitersoftheirbeauty.Andperhapsfaintly,theyhintthatpeopleshouldlooktointangiblequalitieslikecharacterandintellectratherthandietingtheirwaytosinezeroorwasp-waistphysiques.TheFrenchmeasures,however,relytoomuchonseverepunishmenttochangeaculturethatstillregardsbeautyasskin-deep-andbone-showing.Underthelaw,usingafashionmodelthatdoesnotmeetagovernment-definedindexofbodymesscouldresultina$85,000fineandsixmonthsinprison.Thefashionindustryknowsithasaninherentprobleminfocusingonmaterialadornmentandidealizedbodytypes.InDenmark,theUnitedStates,andafewothercountries,itistryingtosetvoluntarystandardformodelsandfashionimagesthererelymoreonpearpressureforenforcement.IncontrasttoFrancesactions,Denmarksfashionindustryagreedlastmonthonrulesandsanctionsregardingage,health,andothercharacteristicsofmodels.ThenewlyrevisedDanishFashionEthicalcharterclearlystates,weareawareofandtakeresponsibilityfortheimpactthefashionindustryhasonbodyideals,especiallyonyoungpeople.ThechartersmaintollofenforcementistodenyaccessfordesignersandmodelingagenciestoCopenhagen.Fashionweek,whichismenbytheDanishFashionInstitute.Butingeneralitreliesonaname-and-shamemethodofcompliance.Relyingonethicalpersuasionratherthanlawtoaddressthemisuseofbodyidealsmaybethebeststep.Evenbetterwouldbetohelpelevatenotionsofbeautybeyondthematerialstandardsofaparticularindustry.21.Accordingtothefirstparagraph,whatwouldhappeninFrance?APhysicalbeautywouldberedefinedBNewrunwayswouldbeconstructedCWebsitesaboutdietingwouldthriveDThefashionindustrywoulddecline 22.Thephraseimpingingon(Line2Para2)isclosestinmeaningtoAheighteningthevalueofBindicatingthestateofClosingfaithinDdoingharmto23.WhichofthefollowingistrueofthefashionindustryATheFrenchmeasureshavealreadyfailedBNewstandardsarebeingsetinDenmarkCModelsarenolongerunderpeerpressureDItsinherentproblemsaregettingworse24.AdesignerismostlikelytoberejectedbyCFWforAsettingperfectphysicalconditionsBcaringtoomuchaboutmodelscharacterCshowinglittleconcernforhealthfactorsDpursuingahighagethresholdformodels25.Whichofthefollowingmaybethebesttitleofthetext?AAchallengetotheFashionIndustrysBodyIdealsBADilemmaforthestarvingmodelsinFranceCJustAnotherRoundofstruggleforbeautyDTheGreatThreatstotheFashionIndustryText2Forthefirsttimeinthehistorymorepeopleliveintownsthaninthecountry.InBritainthishashadacuriousresult.WhilepollsshowBritonsratethecountrysidealongsidetheroyalfamily.ShakespeareandtheNationalHealthService(NHS)aswhatmakethemproudestoftheircountry,thishaslimitedpoliticalsupport.AcenturyagoOctaviaHilllaunchedtheNationalTrustnottorescuestylishhousesbuttosavethebeautyofnaturalplacesforeveryoneforever.Itwasspecificallytoprovidecitydwellerswithspacesforleisurewheretheycouldexperiencearefreshingair.Hillspressurelaterledtothecreationofnationalparksandgreenbelts.Theydontmakecountrysideanymore,andeveryyearconcreteconsumesmoreofit.Itneedsconstantguardianship.Atthenextelectionnoneofthebigpartiesseemlikelytoendorsethissentiment.TheConservativesplanningreformexplicitlygivesruraldevelopmentpriorityoverconservation,evenauthorizingoff-planbuildingwherelocalpeoplemightobject.Theconceptofsustainabledevelopmenthasbeendefinedasprofitable.Labourlikewisewantstodiscontinuelocalplanningwherecouncilsopposedevelopment.TheLiberalDemocratsaresilentonlyusensingitschance,hassideswiththosepleadingforamoreconsideredapproachtousinggreenland.ItscampaigntoprotectRuralEnglandstruckterrorintomanylocalconservativeparties. Thesensibleplacetobuildnewhousesfactoriesandofficesiswherepeopleareincitiesandtownswhereinfrastructureisinplace.TheLondonagentsStirlingAckroyedrecentlyidentifiedenoughsitesforhalfofmillionhousesintheLandonareaalonewithnointrusionongreenbelts.WhatistrueofLondoniseventrueroftheprovinces.Theideathathousingcrisisequalsconcretedmeadowsispurelobbytalk.Theissueisnottheneedformorehousesbut,asalways,wheretoputthemunderlobbypressure,GeorgeOsbornefavoursruralnew-buildagainsturbanrenovationandrenewal.Hefavoursout-of-townshoppingsitesagainsthighstreets.Thisisnotafreemarketbutabiasedone.Ruraltownsandvillageshavegrownandwillalwaysgrow.Theydosobestwherebuildingstickstotheiredgesandrespectstheircharacter.Wedonotruinurbanconservationareas.Whyruinruralones?Developmentshouldbeplanned,notlettrip,AftertheNetherlands,BritainisEuropesmostcrowedcountry.Halfacenturyoftownandcountryplanninghasenableittoretainanenviableruralcoherence,whilestillpermittinglow-densityurbanliving.Thereisnodoubtofthealternative-thecorruptedlandscapesofsouthernPortugal,SpainorIreland.Avoidingthisratherthanpromotingitshouldunitetheleftandrightofthepoliticalspectrum.26.BritainspublicsentimentaboutthecountrysideAisnotwellreflectedinpoliticsBisfullybackedbytheroyalfamilyCdidntstartfilltheShakespeareanageDhasbroughtmuchbenefittotheNHS27.Accordingtoparagraph2,theachievementsoftheNationalTrustarenowbeingAlargelyovershadowedBproperlyprotectedCeffectivelyreinforcedDgraduallydestroyed28.Whichofthefollowingcanbeofferedfromparagraph3ALabourisunderattackforopposingdevelopmentBTheConservativesmayabandonoff-planbuildingCUkipmaygainfromitssupportforruralconservationDTheLiberalDemocratsarelosingpoliticalinfluence 29.TheauthorholdsthatGeorgeOsbornesspreferenceAshowshisdisregardforthecharacterofruralareaBstressesthenecessityofeasingthehousingcrisisChighlightshisfirmstandagainstlobbypressureDrevealsastrongprejudiceagainsturbanareas30.InthelastparagraphtheauthorshowhisappreciationofAthesizeofpopulationinBritainBtheenviableurbanlifestyleinBritainCthetown-and-countryplanninginBritainDthepoliticallifeintodaysBritainText3ThereisoneandonlyonesocialresponsibilityofbusinesswroteMiltonFriedman,aNobelPrize-winningeconomistThatis,touseitsresourcesandengageinactivitiesdesignedtoincreaseitsprofits.ButevenifyouacceptFriedmanspremiseandregardcorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)policiesasawasteofshareholderssmoney,thingsmaynotbeabsolutelyclear-act.NewresearchsuggeststhatCSRmaycreatemonetaryvalueforcompaniesatleastwhentheyareprosecutedforcorruption.ThelargestfirmsinAmericaandBritaintogetherspendmorethan$15billionayearonCSR,accordingtoanestimatebyEPG,aconsultingfirm.Thiscouldaddvaluetotheirbusinessesinthreeways.First,consumersmaytakeCSRspendingasasignalthatacompanysproductsareofhighquality.Second,customersmaybewillingtobuyacompanysproductsasanindirectmaytodonatetothegoodcausesithelps.Andthird,throughamorediffusehaloeffectwherebyitsgooddeedsearnitgreaterconsiderationfromconsumersandothers.PreviousstudiesonCSRhavehadtroubledifferentiatingtheseeffectsbecauseconsumerscanbeaffectedbyallthree.ArecentstudyattemptstoseparatethembylookingatbriberyprosecutionsunderAmericansForeignCorruptPracticesAct(FCPA).Itarguesthatsinceprosecutorsdonotconsumeacompanysproductsaspartoftheirinvestigations,theycouldbeinfluencedonlybythehaloeffect.Thestudyfoundthat,amongprosecutedfirms,thosewiththemostcomprehensiveCSRprogrammestendedtogetmorelenientpenalties.Theiranalysisruledoutthepossibilitythatitwasfirmspoliticalinfluence,ratherthantheirCSRstand,thataccountedfortheleniency:Companiesthatcontributedmoretopoliticalcampaignsdidnotreceivelowerfines.Inall,thestudyconcludesthatwhereasprosecutorsshouldonlyevaluateacasebasedonitsmerits,theydoseemtobeinfluencedbyacompanysrecordinCSR.Weestimatethateithereliminatingasubstantiallabour-rightsconcern,suchaschildlabour,orincreasingcorporategivingbyabout20%resultinfinesthatgenerallyare40%lowerthanthetypicalpunishmentforbribingforeignofficials.saysoneresearcher. ResearchersadmitthattheirstudydoesnotanswerthequestionathowmuchbusinessesoughttospendonCSR.Nordoesitrevealhowmuchcompaniesarebankingonthehaloeffect,ratherthantheotherpossiblebenefits,whentheycompaniesgetintotroublewiththelaw,evidenceofgoodcharactercanwinthemalesscostlypunishment.31.TheauthorviewsMiltonFriedmansstatementaboutCSRwithAuncertaintyBskepticismCapprovalDtolerance32.AccordingtoParagraph2,CSRhelpsacompanybyAguardingitagainstmalpracticesBprotectingitfromconsumersCwinningtrustfromconsumers.Draisingthequalityofitsproducts33.Theexpressionmorelenient(line2,Para.4)isclosestinmeaningtoAlesscontroversialBmorelastingCmoreeffectiveDlesssevere34.Whenprosecutorsevaluateacase,acompanysCSRrecordAcomesacrossasreliableevidenceBhasanimpactontheirdecisionCincreasesthechanceofbeingpenalizedDconstitutespartoftheinvestigation35.WhichofthefollowingistrueofCSRaccordingtothelastparagraph?AThenecessaryamountofcompaniesspendingonitisunknownBCompaniesfinancialcapacityforithasbeenoverestimatedCItsnegativeeffectsonbusinessesareoftenoverlookedDIthasbroughtmuchbenefittothebankingindustryText4TherewilleventuallycomeadaywhenTheNewYorkTimesceasestopublishstoriesonnewsprint.Exactlywhenthatdaywillbeisamatterofdebate.Sometimeinthefuture,thepaperspublishersaidbackin2010.Nostalgiaforinkonpaperandtherustleofpagesaside,theresplentyofincentivetoditchprint.Theinfrastructurerequiredtomakeaphysicalnewspaper-printingpresses,deliverytrucks-isntjustexpensive;itsexcessiveatatimewhenonline-onlycompetitorsdonthavethesamesetoffinancialconstraints.Readersaremigratingawayfromprintanyway.Andthoughprintadsalesstilldwarftheironlineandmobilecounterparts,revenuefromprintisstilldeclining. Overheadmaybehighandcirculationlower,butrushingtoeliminateitsprinteditionwouldbeamistake,saysBuzzFeedCEOJonahPeretti.PerettisaystheTimesshouldntwastetimegettingoutoftheprintbusiness,butonlyiftheygoaboutdoingittherightway.Figuringoutawaytoacceleratethattransitionwouldmakesenseforthem,hesaid,butifyoudiscontinueit,youregoinghaveyourmostloyalcustomersreallyupsetwithyou.Sometimesthatsworthmakingachangeanyway.PerettigivestheexampleofNetflixdiscontinuingitsDVD-mailingservicetofocusonstreaming.Itwasseenasblunder,hesaid.Themoveturnedouttobeforesighted.AndifPerettiwereinchargeattheTimes?Iwouldntpickayeartoendprint,hesaidIwouldraisepricesandmakeitintomoreofalegacyproduct.Themostloyalcustomerswouldstillgettheproducttheyfavor,theideagoes,andtheydfeelliketheywerehelpingsustainthequalityofsomethingtheybelievein.Soifyoureoverpayingforprint,youcouldfeellikeyouwerehelping,Perettisaid.Thenincreaseitatahigherrateeachyearandessentiallytrytogenerateadditionalrevenue.Inotherwords,ifyouregoingtomakeaprintproduct,makeitforthepeoplewhoarealreadyobsessedwithit.WhichmaybewhattheTimesisdoingalready.Gettingtheprinteditionsevendaysaweekcostsnearly$500ayear-morethantwiceasmuchasadigital-onlysubscription.ItsareallyhardthingtodoanditsatremendousluxurythatBuzzFeeddoesnthavealegacybusiness,Perettiremarked.Butweregoingtohavequestionslikethatwherewehavethingsweredoingthatdontmakesensewhenthemarketchangesandtheworldchanges.Inthosesituations,itsbettertobemoreaggressivethatlessaggressive.36.TheNewYorkTimesisconsideringendingitsprinteditionpartlyduetoAtheincreasingonlineandsalesBthepressurefromitsinvestorsCthecomplaintsfromitsreadersDthehighcostofoperation37.Perettisuggeststhatinfaceofthepresentsituation,TheTimesshouldAmakestrategicadjustmentsBendtheprintseditionforgoodCseeknewsourcesofleadershipDaimforefficientmanagement 38.Itcanbeinferredfromparagraphs5and6thatalegacyproductAhelpsrestorethegloryofformertimesBismeantforthemostloyalcustomersCwillhavethecostofprintingreducedDexpandsthepopularityofthepaper39.PerettibelievesthatinachangingworldAtraditionalluxuriescanstayunaffectedBcautiousnessfacilitatesproblem-solvingCaggressivenessbettermeetschallengesDlegacybusinessesarebecomingoutdated40.whichofthefollowingwouldbethebesttitleofthetext?AshifttoonlinenewspapersallatonceBCherishtheNewspapersstillinYourHandCkeepYourNewspapersForeverinFashionDMakeYourprintNewspapersaluxuryGoodPartBDirections:ReadthefollowingtextandanswerthequestionsbychoosingthemostsuitablesubheadingfromthelistA-Gforeachofthenumberedparagraphs(41-45).Therearetwoextrasubheadings.MarkyouranswersontheANSERSHEET.(10point)ACreateanewimageofyourselfBDecideifthetimeisrightCHaveconfidenceinyourselfDUnderstandthecontextEWorkwithprofessionalsFMakeitefficientGKnowyourgoalsNomatterhowformalorinformaltheworkenvironment,thewayyoupresentyourselfhasanimpact.Thisisespeciallytrueinthefirstimpressions.AccordingtoresearchfromPrincetonUniversity,peopleassessyourcompetence,trustworthiness,andlikeabilityinjustatenthofasecond,solelybasedonthewayyoulook. Thedifferencebetweentodaysworkplaceandthedressforsuccesseraisthattherangeofoptionsissomuchbroader.Normshaveevolvedandfragmented.Insomesettings,redsneakersordressT-shirtscanconveystatus;inothernotsomuch.Plus,whateverimagewepresentismagnifiedbysocial-mediaserviceslikeLinkedIn.Chancesare,yourheadshotsareseenmuchmoreoftennowthanadecadeortwoago.Millennials,itseems,facetheparadoxofbeingtheleastformalgenerationyetthemostconsciousofstyleandpersonalbranding.Itcanbeconfusing.Sohowdowenavigatethis?Howdoweknowwhentoinvestinanupgrade?Andwhatsthebestwaytopulloffonethanenhancesourgoals?Herearesometips:41_Asanexecutivecoach,Iveseenimageupgradesbeparticularhelpfulduringtransitions-whenlookingforanewjob,steppingintoanewormorepublicrole,orchangingworkenvironments.Ifyoureinaperiodofchangeorjustfeelingstuckandinarut,nowmaybe
展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 办公文档 > 教学培训


copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!