英文辩论稿样本.doc

礼仪/辩论赛 英文辩论稿样本 英文辩论稿怎么撰写?来看看范文吧，下面是小编搜集整理的英文辩论稿，欢迎阅读。Outline for BeginnersFollowing is a speech outline for (EFL) novice debaters. Too much reliance on this may make your speech inflexible; still, the expressions and the speech flow below are the basic which every (EFL) debater should keep in mind. 1. GreetingsLadies and gentlemenThank you Mr. (Madam) speaker.Mr./Madam chair, and members of this house. 2. Presenting the motion and caseToday, we are going to debate on./Today, we have the motion that./Todays motion is that.Under the current situation, there are some problems in/controversy over.The issue behind the motion is that.So, in this round, we are going to talk about how to solve the problem.(Note: of course, this is mainly the task of the Prime Minister) However, this motion has some vague points(words)/is not clear. Therefore, I would like to define the motion. In this round, we will define the word A as B/limit X to Y/focus on the case in . Therefore, our proposal is that I will explain the mechanism of our proposal.First, .Second, . We have some conditions to our proposal.First, . Second, 3. Showing the (government / opposition) “stance” (or “team line”) for the round.We will propose you that because .Our team line is that /The government / opposition side strongly believe (insist) that . 4. Presenting your speech outline and team allocation.We have points to support our proposal (argument). The first point is , the second point is , and the last point is .I will explain .And my partner will explain .I will mainly talk about . And my partner will talk about 5. Refutation(Before we go on to our arguments / points/ substantive matters), let me refute back to the Government / Opposition side. I have one / two / refutation. First / second / , they said . But, it is (1. not relevant / 2. ). That is because .(e.g. their argument is based onwrong assumption / analysis /misunderstanding)1. not true 5. the opposite2. not always true3. not significant4. not relevant 6. Explaining points. Sign post (i.e. “sign post”, or simple key phrases that summarize the point).Our first (second / ) point is Summary in one sentenceIt means that / On this point, I will explain that . Reasoning (explanation on how one situation occurs, focusing on “cause and effect”)Let me explain how this will happen.First, . Then, . / Under the status quo, . After the plan adoption, . /As a result / Consequently / At the end of the day / Therefore . Examples and IllustrationFor example, . / Lets think about the case of . /Ladies and gentlemen, please imagine what could be happened if Significance / analysis / Relevancy to the stance, team line, or what you want to provewhy this is important? This is because .This point is important if we think about the nature / role / first priority / of .What is the nature of ?What is the role / top priority of ? 7. ConclusionSpend approximately 30 seconds to summarize your speech.In summary / Let me summarize what I have told you / In conclusion, we find that /For all these reasons, I beg to propose / oppose.Because of these reasons, we strongly believe .Therefore, we believe that .RefutationRefutation, which is to point out the weakness of the other sides arguments, can be formulated into six basic types as below:1. not relevant2. not true3. not always true4. not significant5. alternative play6. flip Not relevant: “What you said is not relevant with what you are trying to prove. “e.g. GOV Korean government should abolish death penalty because Canada abolished.OPP It is not relevant because we are debating on Korea not on Canada. Not true: “You are a liar!”e.g. OPP Korean government should not abolish death penalty because it deters crimes.GOV It is not true because crime rate is increasing even though we have death penalty. Not always true: “What you said is not always true.”e.g. OPP Korean government should not abolish death penalty because of the victim families feeling.GOV It is not always true because peoples feelings are case by case. Not significant: “What you said is not important at all.”e.g. OPP Korean government should have death penalty because life in prison costs much more money.GOV It is not significant because those who are sentenced death penalty are put into jail long years before they are actually being executed. Alternative plan: “There is a better plan to solve the problem”e.g. GOV Korean government should abolish death penalty because of the possibility of misjudgments.OPP There is a better solution to the problem, which is to have three trial systems and introduce new technology for investigation. Flip: ”What you said is the opposite. It is actually our point”e.g. OPP Korean government should not abolish death penalty because Koran government should protect its citizens as government role.GOVOutline: Reply SpeechThe purpose of reply speech is quite different from the constructive speeches (e.g. PM speech). In reply speech, you assume the role of adjudicators; to be more precise, you are to explain the reason why your side has won the round.You are expected to do:a. explain the criteria to judge the roundb. summarize the round focusing on issues (or “crash point”).c. Provide new illustrations to emphasize your arguments.1. GreetingsThank you Mr. (Madam) speaker.Good morning / afternoon / evening ladies and gentlemen in this house again.2. Showing the outline.So far, we have talked about .In order to show, why we have to win this round. I would compare both government and opposition sides arguments in terms of two / three issues in this round. They are . I have two / three questions to ask. They are .3. Pointing out the failures of the other side.Before going to the issues, I would like to point out the crucial failure of the government /opposition side. That is .4. Comparing arguments focusing on issues (crash points). The first question / issue / crash point is . Your opponent has said that .Still, we have pointed out that this wrong because . On the other hand, we have argued that because .Our argument was superior to their argument because .Then, let me go on to the next question / issue / crash point.5. Conclusion. For all these reasons, government / opposition side has won this round. Thank you.*l