国际私法第四章

单击此处编辑母版标题样式,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,*,4-1 法则区别说 Theory of Statutes,3-1-1 意大利的法则区别说 The Italian School,3-1-1-1 产生背景 Background,3-1-1-2 代表人物及主要观点 Bartoluss argument:,Personal law v.Real law,3-1-1-3 评价及影响 Comments,3-1-2 法国的法则区别说 The French School,3-1-2-1 Dumoulins Contribution:Party autonomy,3-1-2-2 dAgentres notion:mixed law&territorrialism,第四章 适用外国法的理由,Justification for application,of foreign law,Member States(62)of the Hague Conference on Private International Law,4-2 国际礼让说,Comity Theory,3-2-1 产生背景 Background,3-2-2 代表人物Huber的主要观点,Hubers Main Opinions,3-2-3 评价和影响 Comments,4-3 法律关系本座说Legal Relationship Seat Theory,3-3-1 背景Background,3-3-2 代表人物Savigny的主要观点,Savignys Arguments,He rejected the Statutist doctrine,the unilateral approach and the primacy of the Lex fori.Instead Savigny adopted and perfected the bilateral choice-of-law approach,3-3-3 评价和影响,comments and Its Influences,4-4 既得权说Doctrine of Vested Rights,3-4-1 历史条件,Historical Background,3-4-2 代表人物Dicey的主要观点,Diceys Idea,3-4-3 影响和评价 Comments,4-5 本地法说Local Law Theory,3-5-1 背景Background,Story的国际礼让说；Beale的既得权说,3-5-2 Cook的解说 Cooks Explanation,The Logical and Legal bases of Conflict of Laws（1942）,3-5-3 贡献与不足 Contributions,4-6 政府利益分析说Governmental Interests Analysis,3-6-1 背景,Background,3-6-2 Currie的主要观点 Curries contribution,Rejection of all choice-of-law rules,the concept of governmental interests,False conflicts V.true conflicts,3-6-3 影响和适用 its application in USA,4-7 最密切联系原则Doctrine of the Most Significant Relationship,3-7-1 背景 Background,3-7-2 第二次冲突法重述 The Restatement Second,The“most-significant-relationship”formula,Rules:some black-letter choice-of law rules,Presumptive rules,Ad hoc analysis,3-7-3 影响和适用its application,21 states had adopted the Restatement Second for tort,and 25 for contract,several for mixed”approach,4-8 中国学者的解说Chinese Scholars Explanation,3-8-1 国际交往互利 Doctrine of Mutual Benefit of international Communication,3-8-2 适用外国法的具体理由 the particular reasoning,A.有时对本国国家和当事人更有利,B.有时是必须的,C.是国家主权和法律协调的结果,D.适用外国法并不违背国家主权,Comity was defined as something between mere courtesy and a legal duty,as derived from the tacit consent of nation and based on mutual forbearance and enlightened self-interest.In a ten page essay,the most famous of these authors,Ulricus Huber(1624-1694),postulated the following three axioms:,(1)The laws of each state have force within the territory but not beyond.,(2)These laws bind all those who are found within the territory,whether permanently or temporarily.,(3),Out of comity,foreign laws may be applied so that rights acquired under them can retain the their force,provided that they do not prejudice the states power or rights.,案例4-1Babcock v.Jackson,1963年9月，住所在纽约的夫妇Jackson邀请同住一城的Babcock小姐驱车到加拿大作周末旅游。Jackson先生驾车，在安大略省发生车祸使小姐严重受伤。Babcock小姐回纽约后向法院起诉，要求赔偿损失。按安大略省法律规定，除以盈利为目的运载乘客外，汽车的所有者和驾驶者对乘客因车祸造成的损失不负责任；而纽约州法律规定要承担责任。初审法院适用侵权行为地法，驳回原告的要求。原告不服提起上诉。,你认为该如何处理？,